Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jul 5:4:16.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-16.

WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges

Affiliations
Comparative Study

WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: methodological issues and challenges

A Metin Gülmezoglu et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Reducing maternal mortality and morbidity are among the key international development goals. A prerequisite for monitoring the progress towards attainment of these goals is accurate assessment of the levels of mortality and morbidity. In order to contribute to mapping the global burden of reproductive ill-health, we are conducting a systematic review of incidence and prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity.

Methods: We followed the standard methodology for systematic reviews. We prepared a protocol and a form for data extraction that identify key characteristics on study and reporting quality. An extensive search was conducted for the years 1997-2002 including electronic and hand searching.

Results: We screened the titles and abstracts of about 65,000 citations identified through 11 electronic databases as well as various other sources. Four thousand six hundred and twenty-six full-text reports were critically appraised and 2443 are included in the review so far. Approximately one third of the studies were conducted in Asia and Africa. The reporting quality was generally low with definitions for conditions and the diagnostic methods often not reported.

Conclusions: There are unique challenges and issues regarding the search, critical appraisal and summarizing epidemiological data in this systematic review of prevalence/incidence studies. More methodological studies and discussion to advance the field will be useful. Considerable efforts including leadership, consensus building and resources are required to improve the standards of monitoring burden of disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the process of identifying and including references for the systematic review.

References

    1. Revised 1990 estimates of maternal mortality. A new approach by WHO and UNICEF. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.11. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization; 1996.
    1. Maternal mortality in 1995: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Hill K, AbouZahr C, Wardlaw T. Estimates of maternal mortality for 1995. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79:182–193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hakkert R. Country estimates for maternal mortality: an alternative model. Statistics in medicine. 2001;20:3505–3524. doi: 10.1002/sim.1075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villar J, Betrán AP, Gülmezoglu AM, Say L. WHO leads global effort on systematic reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003;32:164–165. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg119. - DOI - PubMed