Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
- PMID: 15238110
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00201.x
Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the glove perforation rate, efficacy of double gloving, effect of duration of surgery, expertise of surgeon and operative urgency on the glove perforation rate in obstetrical and gynecologic operations.
Methods: From February to September 2002, double glove protocol was made necessary for all major obstetrical and gynecologic procedures. The operating surgeon, first and second assistant were included in the study. Gloves damage was noted (overt by inspection, occult by hydroinsufflation technique).
Results: Of the 156 procedures included in study, 32 procedures were performed (all emergency operations) single-gloved because surgeons found double gloving clumsy (56%), made it difficult to tie knots due to lack of dexterity (24%), or were too tight (20%). One thousand one hundred and twenty single gloves were examined after each procedure by hydroinsufflation. The overall perforation rate was 13.6% (single versus double outer gloves, 13.8% versus l3.2%, P > 0.05). Matching perforations were found in six cases (4.6%). Thus, the protection offered by double gloves was 95.4% even if the outer gloves were perforated. Four inner gloves had preexisting perforations. Sixty unused gloves checked similarly revealed a perforation rate of 1.6%. Emergency cases had higher perforation rate compared to elective surgeries (16.6% versus 10.8%, P < 0.00 1). Surgeries lasting for more than 40 min had a higher perforation rate compared to those finished in less than or equal to 40 min (18.6% versus 7.6%, P < 0.001). The middle finger of the left hand was the most commonly involved. The surgeon, first assistant and second assistant were involved in 73.6, 23.3 and 3.2% cases, respectively.
Conclusion: Double gloving offers considerable protection against exposure to contaminants in the blood and body fluids of the patient and should be made routine, especially in developing countries where HIV, hepatitis B and C are widely prevalent. Double gloving should be made mandatory in emergency procedures, which have a higher perforation rate due to operative urgency, and gloves should be changed in operations lasting for more than 40 min to ensure integrity of barrier.
Similar articles
-
Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Jun;268(2):82-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0343-2. Epub 2002 Aug 28. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003. PMID: 12768294
-
The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations.Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1019-22. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1945200
-
Single versus double-gloving for obstetric and gynecologic procedures.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e36-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.045. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17466674
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
-
[What is the appropriate time-interval for changing gloves during surgical procedures].Zentralbl Chir. 2010 Feb;135(1):25-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224684. Epub 2010 Jan 27. Zentralbl Chir. 2010. PMID: 20108181 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
-
Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.World J Surg. 2006 Jan;30(1):134-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0172-0. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16369716 Clinical Trial.
-
Perforation rates in double latex gloves and protective effects of outer work gloves in a postmortem examination room: A STROBE-compliant study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16348. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016348. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31277191 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):3856-61. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02746-05. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16751489 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical glove perforation in caesarean section and its association with surgical site infections: a prospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08002-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40796812 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous