Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jul 6;141(1):47-56.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00014.

Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose

Peter C Minneci et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Previous meta-analyses demonstrated that high-dose glucocorticoids were not beneficial in sepsis. Recently, lower-dose glucocorticoids have been studied.

Purpose: To compare recent trials of glucocorticoids for sepsis with previous glucocorticoid trials.

Data sources: Systematic MEDLINE search for studies published between 1988 and 2003.

Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials of sepsis that examined the effects of glucocorticoids on survival or vasopressor requirements.

Data extraction: Two investigators independently collected data on patient and study characteristics, treatment interventions, and outcomes.

Data synthesis: The 5 included trials revealed a consistent and beneficial effect of glucocorticoids on survival (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.23, [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.50]; P = 0.036) and shock reversal (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.71 [CI, 1.29 to 2.26]; P < 0.001). These effects were the same regardless of adrenal function. In contrast, 8 trials published before 1989 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]; P = 0.008). In comparison with the earlier trials, the more recent trials administered steroids later after patients met enrollment criteria (median, 23 hours vs. <2 hours; P = 0.02), for longer courses (6 days vs. 1 day; P = 0.01), and in lower total dosages (hydrocortisone equivalents, 1209 mg vs. 23 975 mg; P = 0.01) to patients with higher control group mortality rates (mean, 57% vs. 34%; P = 0.06) who were more likely to be vasopressor-dependent (100% vs. 65%; P = 0.03). The relationship between steroid dose and survival was linear, characterized by benefit at low doses and increasing harm at higher doses (P = 0.02).

Limitations: We could not analyze time-related improvements in medical care and potential bias secondary to nonreporting of negative study results.

Conclusions: Although short courses of high-dose glucocorticoids decreased survival during sepsis, a 5- to 7-day course of physiologic hydrocortisone doses with subsequent tapering increases survival rate and shock reversal in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms

Substances