Randomised clinical trial of elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae
- PMID: 15239872
- PMCID: PMC1964197
- DOI: 10.1308/147870804317
Randomised clinical trial of elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral venous thrombophlebitis (PVT) represents a considerable source of iatrogenic morbidity, occurring in about 20% of hospital in-patients. The aim of this prospective randomised study was to investigate the effect of elective change of intravenous cannulae on the incidence of PVT in hospital in-patients.
Patients and methods: General medical and surgical inpatients requiring intravenous therapy were randomised into control (n = 26) or study (n = 21) groups. Cannulae in the control group were only removed if the site became painful, the cannula dislodged, or there were signs of PVT. Cannulae in the study group were changed electively every 48 h. All patients were examined daily for signs of PVT.
Results: Peripheral venous thrombophlebitis developed in 11/26 patients in the control group and 1/21 patients in the study group (P = 0.003). Elective change of cannulae did not significantly increase the total number of cannulae sited (41 cannulae in the control group versus 43 in the study group).
Conclusions: Elective change of cannulae resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of infusion phlebitis. The authors recommend that elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae becomes standard practice for all patients requiring intravenous therapy.
Similar articles
-
Does elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae decrease peripheral thrombophlebitis? A randomized controlled study.Natl Med J India. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):60-2. Natl Med J India. 2009. PMID: 19852337 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of cannula material on the incidence of peripheral venous thrombophlebitis.Anaesthesia. 2007 Nov;62(11):1139-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05180.x. Anaesthesia. 2007. PMID: 17924895 Clinical Trial.
-
Position of peripheral venous cannulae and the incidence of thrombophlebitis: an observational study.J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jun;65(6):1268-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04980.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3. J Adv Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19374679
-
[Venous catheterization can cause infusion thrombophlebitis. Study of the literature on its causes and occurrence].Lakartidningen. 1996 Nov 27;93(48):4398, 4403-4. Lakartidningen. 1996. PMID: 8992157 Review. Swedish. No abstract available.
-
Peripheral Vein Thrombophlebitis in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review of a Frequent and Important Problem.Am J Med. 2020 Apr;133(4):473-484.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.054. Epub 2019 Oct 10. Am J Med. 2020. PMID: 31606488
Cited by
-
Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Med. 2010 Sep 10;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53. BMC Med. 2010. PMID: 20831782 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 23;1(1):CD007798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30671926 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinically indicated replacement and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 12;9:964096. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.964096. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36035414 Free PMC article.
-
Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2008 Jul 8;337(7662):a339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a339. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18614482 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources