Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Jul;54(504):531-5.

The prevention of type 2 diabetes: general practitioner and practice nurse opinions

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The prevention of type 2 diabetes: general practitioner and practice nurse opinions

Rhys Williams et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes is now possible with lifestyle or pharmacological interventions in people who are at risk. Primary care would seem to be the legitimate setting for this to take place.

Aim: To explore the views of general practitioners and practice nurses about the detection and management of people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Design of study: Qualitative study.

Setting: One local health board area in Wales.

Method: General practitioners and practice nurses participated in multi-professional focus groups, and opinions of participants were analysed into themes and sub-themes according to focus group content analysis methodology to search for 'markers of text'.

Results: Participants from 21 practices were involved. Participants' opinions on the detection and management of individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes were polarised into those who considered these activities inappropriate for primary care and those who were already engaged in the detection, management and follow-up of these individuals. For the former, existing workload, the questionable role of primary care as a 'screening service', lack of resources, and conflict and concern about increasing specialisation were given as justification. Those already engaged in these activities emphasised their importance but were also concerned with the lack of available resources. Other concerns were the perceived low motivation of patients to modify their lifestyle and the unnecessary medicalisation of the precursor conditions of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia. The prevention of type 2 diabetes was seen as largely the responsibility of other agencies such as health promotion and education.

Conclusion: The often strongly held views about this topic are at least partly influenced by current pressures on primary care. To make the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes a reality, either practitioners need to be motivated and resourced to carry out preventive strategies or alternative methods must be identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organisation. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1999. (WHO/NCD/NCS/99.2.)
    1. Hamman RF. Prevention of type 2 diabetes. In: Williams R, Herman W, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ, editors. The evidence base for diabetes care. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2002. pp. 75–176.
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention o metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shang P, Engelgau MM, Valdes R, et al. Costs of screening for pre-diabetes among US adults. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2536–2542. - PubMed
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Erikson J, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1343–1350. - PubMed

Publication types