Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jul;87(1):442-56.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.037788.

Mechanokinetics of rapid tension recovery in muscle: the Myosin working stroke is followed by a slower release of phosphate

Affiliations

Mechanokinetics of rapid tension recovery in muscle: the Myosin working stroke is followed by a slower release of phosphate

David A Smith et al. Biophys J. 2004 Jul.

Abstract

Crystallographic and biochemical evidence suggests that the myosin working stroke that generates force in muscle is accompanied by the release of inorganic phosphate (Pi), but the order and relative speed of these transitions is not firmly established. To address this problem, the theory of A. F. Huxley and R. M. Simmons for the length-step response is averaged over elastic strains imposed by filament structure and extended to include a Pi-release transition. Models of this kind are applied to existing tension-recovery data from length steps at different phosphate concentrations, and from phosphate jumps upon release of caged phosphate. This body of data is simulated by the model in which the force-generating event is followed by Pi release. A version in which the Pi-release transition is slow provides a better fit than a version with rapid Pi release and a slow transition preceding force generation. If Pi is released before force generation, the predicted rate of slow recovery increases with the size of the step, which is not observed. Some implications for theories of muscle contraction are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Hypothetical Gibbs-energy landscape seen by a bound myosin head as a function of angle θ between lever arm and filament, and elastic strain x in the prestroke state (Eisenberg et al., 1980; Wood and Mann, 1981). The prestroke state (2) and poststroke state (3) are defined by sharp angular potential wells. At intermediate angles, the lever arm is assumed free to rotate unless tethered to the thick filament, when rotation occurs against the elastic strain energy formula image for a lever-arm of length R. The working stroke to state 3 is formula image here set at 10 nm. Note that strain creates an additional energy barrier to the force-generating transition 2→3 for formula image whereas more negative strains formula image create an additional barrier to the reverse transition. The resulting kinetics is described in the main text.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Phase-2 tension transients, normalized to unity, calculated from the two-state model with strain averaging for various length steps. With formula image constant and all strain-dependent kinetics in the forward rate formula image Eq. 4 predicts universal curves formula image as functions of scaled time formula image and scaled length steps formula image = −10, −9,…, −1, 1,…, 9, 10, where formula image E1(x) is the exponential integral of order 1 (Press et al., 1992). (B) Step dependence of the rate of recovery, to 1/e of the total change, from the above curves (solid line). The function formula image (dotted line) is predicted in the absence of sarcomere averaging (Huxley and Simmons, 1971). The solid curve approximates data of Ford et al. (1977), (♦) for the frog at 4°C, scaled with formula image and formula image (kh = 4.8 pN), except for large releases where recovery is very fast. Rate constants determined experimentally as inverse half-times have been multiplied by 0.693. The dashed curve shows the effect of using the bounded form of formula image (see main text) with K2 = 20; this curve falls below the solid curve for formula image
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Rates of the faster and slower phases (the eigenvalues of Eqs. 8 and 11) versus reduced strain formula image in versions A and B of the three-state model with formula image (Version A) formula image and formula image or formula image for 1 mM or 25 mM [Pi], respectively. Both rates always increase with phosphate and decrease with step size. (Version B) formula image formula image and formula image and 0.4 at low and high Pi as above. The slower rate increases with step size when formula image This condition is met at high phosphate formula image [Pi] > 6.7 mM).
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Biphasic tension recovery from a length step in the two versions of the three-state model, showing, from top to bottom: i), tension recovery at low Pi for 10 different stretches and releases as in Fig. 2 A; ii), rates of the faster phase (logarithmic left-hand vertical scale) and slower phase (right-hand vertical scale) versus reduced step size formula image at low and high Pi; and iii), the fractional amplitude of the fast phase versus step size.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Phosphate dependence of the rate constants shown in Fig. 4, for a large stretch formula image and large release formula image Phosphate concentration is represented by the rate of binding formula image (say 20 s−1 for 1 mM Pi) in version A, or the binding constant formula image (say 0.1 at 1 mM Pi) in version B. Values of kinetic parameters are given under Fig. 3.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Measured rates of tension change after photo release of caged Pi as a function of final Pi concentration (Dantzig et al., 1992; coordinates and standard errors supplied by courtesy of J. Dantzig), fitted to hyperbolic functions passing through the origin (Eq. 12). Unweighted least-squares fitting gives formula image at 10°C, and formula image at 20°C. For the 10°C data, error-weighted fitting gives similar results. Residuals as shown are positive at low Pi.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Predictions of versions A and B for caged-Pi experiments, for 10 upward phosphate jumps from nominally 1 mM Pi, generated by increasing the rate of Pi binding formula image (A) or Pi affinity formula image (B) by successive powers of formula image Values of all other rate constants are given under Fig. 3. (Upper panels) Tension transients, normalized to the total change after equilibration. The slower phase is predominant (see main text). (Lower panels) Empirical rates of change (to 1/e = 0.37) versus final [Pi] as measured by formula image or formula image with various values of formula image Computed coordinates are shown as crosses, and the lines are fitted hyperbolic functions (Eqs. 13A or 13B). For version A, formula image and formula image; formula image and formula image in increasing order of formula image For version B, formula image and formula image similarly, whereas formula image throughout.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brenner, B. 1991. Dynamic dissociation and reassociation of actomyosin cross-bridges during force generation: a newly observed facet of cross-bridge action in muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:10490–10494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, Y.-D., and B. Brenner. 1993. On the regeneration of the actin-myosin power stroke in contracting muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:5148–5152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conibear, P. B., C. R. Bagshaw, P. G. Fajer, M. Kovacs, and A. Malnasi-Csizmadia. 2003. Myosin cleft movement and its coupling to actomyosin dissociation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:831–835. - PubMed
    1. Cook, C. S., M. Ashley-Ross, D. Syme, Y. E. Goldman, and L. C. Rome. 1997. Trading force for speed: cross-bridge kinetics in superfast fibers. Biophys. J. 72:A128. (Abstr.)
    1. Cooke, R. 1997. The mechanism of muscle contraction. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 21:53–118. - PubMed

Publication types