Clinical parameters that predict histology of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node mass in testicular cancer
- PMID: 15242364
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00832.x
Clinical parameters that predict histology of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node mass in testicular cancer
Abstract
Background: Since the advent of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the majority of metastatic testicular cancers can be cured by chemotherapy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). However, postchemotherapy RPLND confers no therapeutic benefit if the residual mass contains no viable cells. Therefore, to determine which parameters predict a patient's likelihood of having only necrosis in the residual mass, we retrospectively analyzed clinical parameters of patients who underwent postchemotherapy RPLND.
Methods: Data from 27 patients with metastatic testicular cancer were analyzed. The histology of the primary tumor was seminoma in 11 cases and non-seminoma in 16 cases. All of the patients with non-seminoma showed a normalization of tumor markers after chemotherapy. Analysis of clinical parameters included data for the initial histology, pretreatment tumor marker levels, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size, and the histology of the dissected RPLNs.
Results: Histological examination of dissected RPLNs showed residual tumor in 27% of seminoma patients and 38% of non-seminoma patients. In seminoma patients, no viable cells were found in all six patients with pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels below 7.5 times the upper limit of normal, or in all five of the patients with postchemotherapy RPLNs less than 2.5 cm. In non-seminoma patients, no viable cells were found in nine of 10 patients with pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels less than 2700 ng/mL, or in eight of nine patients with residual mass less than 2.5 cm.
Conclusions: Both postchemotherapy RPLN mass size and pretreatment tumor marker levels are possible predictors for necrosis of the residual mass in testicular cancer patients.
Similar articles
-
Results of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy in patients with pure seminoma in the orchidectomy specimen but elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein.BJU Int. 2009 Jul;104(2):176-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08697.x. Epub 2009 Jun 2. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19493258
-
Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is effective therapy in selected patients with elevated tumor markers after primary chemotherapy alone.Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):957-62. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00458-5. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9426730
-
Viable germ cell tumor at postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: can we predict patients at risk of disease progression?Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2700-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23104. Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17948916
-
Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced germ cell tumours of the testis.Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.033. Epub 2007 Oct 31. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18045770 Review.
-
Postchemotherapy residual masses in advanced seminoma: current management and outcomes.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005 Oct;5(5):869-74. doi: 10.1586/14737140.5.5.869. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005. PMID: 16221056 Review.
Cited by
-
A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and metastasectomy in advanced nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.Indian J Urol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):112-116. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_301_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7. Indian J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32549662 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical