Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary
- PMID: 1524269
- DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80148-8
Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary
Abstract
Escalating medical care costs during the last decade have resulted in shorter hospital stays and higher volumes of outpatients surgical procedures. As a result, the proportion of nosocomial surgical wound infections manifesting after discharge will increase. We performed a literature review to assess the current state of the art of postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection. From 20% to 70% of postoperative surgical site infections do not become apparent until after the patient's discharge, resulting in serious underreporting of true rates. Infections in outpatients are not being identified efficiently. Institutions using self-reporting methods report a low validity for these methods. The Centers for Disease Control and the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations currently have no strong guidelines on the subject. Since valid postdischarge surveillance may become a necessity for a quality infection control program, new national recommendations are needed.
Similar articles
-
Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;23(7):364-7. doi: 10.1086/502076. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002. PMID: 12138973
-
Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: does judicious monitoring find cases?Am J Infect Control. 1995 Oct;23(5):290-4. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(95)90059-4. Am J Infect Control. 1995. PMID: 8585640
-
Surveillance for surgical site infection after hospital discharge: a surgical procedure-specific perspective.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;27(12):1313-7. doi: 10.1086/509838. Epub 2006 Nov 21. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 17152028
-
Basics of surgical-site infection surveillance.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997 Sep;18(9):659-68. doi: 10.1086/647694. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997. PMID: 9309441 Review.
-
Nosocomial infection surveillance and control policies.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;17(4):295-301. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000136929.75543.8a. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004. PMID: 15241072 Review.
Cited by
-
Using automated health plan data to assess infection risk from coronary artery bypass surgery.Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Dec;8(12):1433-41. doi: 10.3201/eid0812.020039. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 12498660 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Self-Assessment of Surgical Site Infection is Inaccurate.World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):1935-1942. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3974-y. World J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28271262
-
Use of negative pressure wound therapy over clean, closed surgical incisions.Int Wound J. 2012 Aug;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):32-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01017.x. Int Wound J. 2012. PMID: 22727138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):428-42. doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.4.428. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993. PMID: 8269394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections.Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):212-6. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010212. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001. PMID: 11294709 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials