Randomized trial of cefepime monotherapy or cefepime in combination with amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia
- PMID: 15250016
- DOI: 10.1086/383046
Randomized trial of cefepime monotherapy or cefepime in combination with amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia
Abstract
A multicenter open randomized trial was conducted to compare cefepime monotherapy with cefepime/amikacin combination (dual) therapy in treating febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic disorders. Among the 189 evaluable patients, 5.8% had microbiologically and 10.6% had clinically documented infections. Excellent response was seen in 32.6% and 45.7% of monotherapy and dual therapy recipients, respectively, at day 3 (P=.065). At day 3, patients with neutrophil counts of <500/ mu L receiving dual therapy had a better response than did those receiving monotherapy (45% vs. 27.6%; P=.024). The same was true for patients with leukemia. Adverse events were minimal, and early death was observed in 7 patients in the dual therapy group and 5 patients in the monotherapy group. Overall, cefepime monotherapy is as effective as dual therapy for the initial treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. Further study is warranted for patients with severe neutropenia and leukemia who may benefit from dual therapy.
Similar articles
-
Monotherapy versus dual therapy based on risk categorization of febrile neutropenic patients.Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 15;39 Suppl 1:S56-8. doi: 10.1086/383056. Clin Infect Dis. 2004. PMID: 15250023
-
Clinical guidelines for the management of neutropenic patients with unexplained fever in Japan: validation by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 2:S123-7; discussion S133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Oct 24. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005. PMID: 16249072
-
Cefepime or carbapenem treatment for febrile neutropenia as a single agent is as effective as a combination of 4th-generation cephalosporin + aminoglycosides: comparative study.Am J Hematol. 2002 Dec;71(4):248-55. doi: 10.1002/ajh.10236. Am J Hematol. 2002. PMID: 12447952 Clinical Trial.
-
Management of the febrile neutropenic patient: a consensus conference.Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 15;39 Suppl 1:S1-6. doi: 10.1086/383041. Clin Infect Dis. 2004. PMID: 15250013 Review. No abstract available.
-
Febrile neutropenia in haematological malignancies.J Postgrad Med. 2005;51 Suppl 1:S42-8. J Postgrad Med. 2005. PMID: 16519255 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence-based guidelines for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever in Korea.Korean J Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(2):220-52. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2011.26.2.220. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Korean J Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21716917 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of infection in patients with acute leukemia during chemotherapy in Japan: questionnaire analysis by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group.Int J Hematol. 2009 Sep;90(2):191-198. doi: 10.1007/s12185-009-0367-5. Epub 2009 Jun 23. Int J Hematol. 2009. PMID: 19548066
-
Clinical impact of cycling the administration of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with hematological malignancy.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;31(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1290-2. Epub 2011 May 19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 21594713
-
Analysis of bacteremia/fungemia and pneumonia accompanying acute myelogenous leukemia from 1987 to 2001 in the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group.Int J Hematol. 2011 Jan;93(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s12185-010-0746-y. Epub 2011 Jan 7. Int J Hematol. 2011. PMID: 21213127
-
Retrospective survey and evaluation of first-line antibiotics for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;79(1):17-26. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.79.1.17. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28303057 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials