Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function
- PMID: 15250429
Clinical neurophysiology and quantitative sensory testing in the investigation of orofacial pain and sensory function
Abstract
Chronic orofacial pain represents a diagnostic and treatment challenge for the clinician. Some conditions, such as atypical facial pain, still lack proper diagnostic criteria, and their etiology is not known. The recent development of neurophysiological methods and quantitative sensory testing for the examination of the trigeminal somatosensory system offers several tools for diagnostic and etiological investigation of orofacial pain. This review presents some of these techniques and the results of their application in studies on orofacial pain and sensory dysfunction. Clinical neurophysiological investigation has greater diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than clinical examination in the detection of the neurogenic abnormalities of either peripheral or central origin that may underlie symptoms of orofacial pain and sensory dysfunction. Neurophysiological testing may also reveal trigeminal pathology when magnetic resonance imaging has failed to detect it, so these methods should be considered complementary to each other in the investigation of orofacial pain patients. The blink reflex, corneal reflex, jaw jerk, sensory neurography of the inferior alveolar nerve, and the recording of trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potentials with near-nerve stimulation have all proved to be sensitive and reliable in the detection of dysfunction of the myelinated sensory fibers of the trigeminal nerve or its central connections within the brainstem. With appropriately small thermodes, thermal quantitative sensory testing is useful for the detection of trigeminal small-fiber dysfunction (Adelta and C). In neuropathic conditions, it is most sensitive to lesions causing axonal injury. By combining different techniques for investigation of the trigeminal system, an accurate topographical diagnosis and profile of sensory fiber pathology can be determined. Neurophysiological and quantitative sensory tests have already highlighted some similarities among various orofacial pain conditions and have shown heterogeneity within clinical diagnostic categories. With the aid of neurophysiological recordings and quantitative sensory testing, it is possible to approach a mechanism-based classification of orofacial pain.
Similar articles
-
The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy.J Orofac Pain. 2004 Fall;18(4):355-9. J Orofac Pain. 2004. PMID: 15636020
-
Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain.Neurology. 2007 Oct 2;69(14):1451-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277274.83301.c0. Neurology. 2007. PMID: 17909158
-
Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal nerve damage assessment.J Orofac Pain. 2004 Fall;18(4):339-44. J Orofac Pain. 2004. PMID: 15636018
-
Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Neuropathic Orofacial Pain: Role of Clinical Neurophysiology.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov;36(6):422-429. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000583. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31688325 Review.
-
Neurophysiological assessment of trigeminal nerve reflexes in disorders of central and peripheral nervous system.Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;116(10):2255-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.020. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16005260 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of somatosensory dysfunction with symptom duration in burning mouth syndrome.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3471-3477. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2765-7. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 30569338
-
Profiling intraoral neuropathic disturbances following lingual nerve injury and in burning mouth syndrome.BMC Oral Health. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0360-y. BMC Oral Health. 2017. PMID: 28330489 Free PMC article.
-
Temporomandibular disorders in burning mouth syndrome patients: an observational study.Int J Med Sci. 2013 Oct 29;10(12):1784-9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6327. eCollection 2013. Int J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 24273452 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of some less frequently considered blink reflex parameters in idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011 Nov;123(21-22):646-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-011-0074-0. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011. PMID: 22041816
-
Orofacial quantitative sensory testing: Current evidence and future perspectives.Eur J Pain. 2020 Sep;24(8):1425-1439. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1611. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Eur J Pain. 2020. PMID: 32557971 Free PMC article. Review.