Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004;22(11):691-700.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422110-00001.

The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics

Affiliations

The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics

Ahmed M Bayoumi. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004.

Abstract

In health economics, contingent valuation is a method that elicits an individual's monetary valuations of health programmes or health states. This article reviews the theory and conduct of contingent valuation studies, with suggestions for improving the future measurement of contingent valuation for health economics applications. Contingent valuation questions can be targeted to any of the following groups: the general population, to value health insurance premiums for programmes; users of a health programme, to value the associated programme costs; or individuals with a disease, to evaluate health states. The questions can be framed to ask individuals how much they would pay to obtain positive changes in health status or avoid negative changes in health status ('willingness to pay'; WTP) or how much they would need to be paid to compensate for a decrease in health status or for foregoing an improvement in heath status ('willingness to accept'; WTA). In general WTP questions yield more accurate and precise valuations than WTA questions. Payment card techniques, with follow-up bidding using direct interviews with visual aids, are well suited for small contingent valuation studies. Several biases may be operative when assessing contingent valuation, including biases in the way participants are selected, the way in which the questions are posed, the way in which individuals interpret probabilities and value gains relative to losses, and the way in which missing or extreme responses are interpreted. An important aspect of all contingent valuation studies is an assessment of respondents' understanding of the evaluation method and the valuation task. Contingent valuation studies should measure the potential influence of biases, the validity of contingent valuation tests as measures of QOL, and the reliability and responsiveness of responses. Future research should address equity concerns associated with using contingent valuation and explore contingent valuation as a measure of utility for health states, particularly those that are minor or temporary.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Decis Making. 1999 Jan-Mar;19(1):27-37 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Aug;49(4):551-63 - PubMed
    1. Med Decis Making. 2000 Oct-Dec;20(4):404-12 - PubMed
    1. Health Econ. 2001 Mar;10(2):101-18 - PubMed
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593-603 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources