Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind
- PMID: 15250813
- PMCID: PMC1351135
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind
Abstract
Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.
References
-
- Adams JW, Hitch GJ. Working memory and children’s mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1997;67:21–38. - PubMed
-
- Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
- Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
-
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
- Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.