Use of a priori information in estimating tissue resistivities--application to human data in vivo
- PMID: 15253124
- DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/3/013
Use of a priori information in estimating tissue resistivities--application to human data in vivo
Abstract
Accurate resistivity values are necessary to construct reliable numerical models to solve forward/inverse problems in EEG and to localize activity centres in functional brain imaging. These models require accurate geometry and resistivity distribution. The geometry may be extracted from high resolution images. The resistivity distribution may be estimated by using a statistically constrained minimum mean squared error estimator algorithm that has been developed previously by Baysal and Eyüboğlu. In this study, the data are obtained by EEG and MEG sensors during SEF/SEP experiments that involve nine human subjects. The numerical model is realistic, subject-specific and the scalp, the skull and the brain resistivities are estimated. By performing nine different estimations, we found average resistivities of 3.183, 64.559 and 2.833 omega m for scalp, skull and brain, respectively, all under 9% standard deviation. The discrepancies between these results and other works are discussed in detail.
Similar articles
-
Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jul;51(7):1276-80. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827255. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004. PMID: 15248545
-
Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Mar;55(3):1103-11. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.906493. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008. PMID: 18334402
-
Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4903-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347093. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012. PMID: 23367027
-
Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Aug;44(8):727-35. doi: 10.1109/10.605429. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997. PMID: 9254986
-
Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG.Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jun;30(6):1866-76. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20775. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009. PMID: 19360734 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.J Neural Eng. 2015 Aug;12(4):046028. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046028. Epub 2015 Jul 14. J Neural Eng. 2015. PMID: 26170066 Free PMC article.
-
Validating EEG, MEG and Combined MEG and EEG Beamforming for an Estimation of the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cortical Dysplasia.Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):114. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010114. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35053857 Free PMC article.
-
Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2862-78. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20714. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009. PMID: 19117275 Free PMC article.
-
CutFEM-based MEG forward modeling improves source separability and sensitivity to quasi-radial sources: A somatosensory group study.Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 1;45(11):e26810. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26810. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. PMID: 39140847 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:2133-2141. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3120148. Epub 2021 Oct 28. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021. PMID: 34648453 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources