Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations in contraceptive choice and patient counseling
- PMID: 15264608
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00444.x
Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations in contraceptive choice and patient counseling
Abstract
Purpose: To review currently available choices for non-daily hormonal contraception, considering efficacy, safety, patient counseling issues, and appropriate patient selection.
Data sources: Worldwide medical literature and the individual products' prescribing information.
Conclusions: Patients and clinicians have many nondaily hormonal contraceptive options available--from Depo-Provera quarterly injection, which has been available in the United States for over 10 years, to several new entries (Mirena 5-year intrauterine system, Lunelle monthly injection, NuvaRing monthly intravaginal ring, and Ortho Evra weekly transdermal patch). All these options offer high efficacy and enhanced convenience for many patients over daily oral contraceptives (OCs). Barriers to use of these agents may include patients' lack of information as well as fear or misconceptions regarding the hormones and methods. All of these can be addressed with adequate patient counseling and open dialogue. The clinician and patient need to be well-informed regarding these options so that they can work together and identify the best contraceptive fit for the patient---with the ultimate goal being to increase patient satisfaction and adherence and, thus, avoid unintended pregnancy.
Implications for practice: Despite the efficacy of OCs, missed pills are quite common and contribute to unintended pregnancy. Many women in all population categories would benefit from the convenience and reliability of nondaily hormonal contraceptives. The highest efficacy rates with typical use are associated with agents that require minimal user participation (i.e., Depo-Provera, Mirena). Compared to daily regimens, all nondaily options offer increased convenience and may contribute to improved patient adherence. However, barriers to use may exist. Patient fears regarding use of hormones can be minimized by discussing the long-term safety of hormonal contraceptives. (The data are predominantly derived from Depo-Provera and OCs because these agents have been available in the United States and in the rest of the world for much longer than the newer nondaily options.) Patient counseling and appropriate expectations regarding changes in menstrual pattern have been demonstrated to further enhance patient adherence to therapy. Finally, patient lifestyle preferences must be considered. The finding that many women are comfortable with or even prefer amenorrhea, which is associated with options such as Depo-Provera, highlights how important it is for clinicians to avoid making assumptions about a patient's contraceptive preferences. Rather, clinicians and patients should exchange information through an open dialogue. For the majority of patients, nondaily hormonal contraceptives should be considered and offered as first-line options.
Similar articles
-
Considerations for the use of progestin-only contraceptives.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Feb;22(2):81-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00473.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010. PMID: 20132366 Review.
-
[The CHOICE study (Contraceptive Health Research Of Informed Choice Experience)--an educational research program for Polish women planning combined hormonal contraceptives use].Ginekol Pol. 2012 Jun;83(6):417-23. Ginekol Pol. 2012. PMID: 22880460 Polish.
-
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31013349 Free PMC article.
-
Contraception in the adolescent patient.Prim Care. 1995 Mar;22(1):145-59. Prim Care. 1995. PMID: 7777635 Review.
-
Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):69-76. Br J Fam Plann. 1999. PMID: 10454658 Review.
Cited by
-
Norethindrone is superior to combined oral contraceptive pills in short-term delay of menses and onset of breakthrough bleeding: a randomized trial.BMC Womens Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0766-6. BMC Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 31138184 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hormonal Contraceptives, Female Sexual Dysfunction, and Managing Strategies: A Review.J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 25;8(6):908. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060908. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31242625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multisite Study of Women Living With HIV's Perceived Barriers to, and Interest in, Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Jul 1;84(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002337. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020. PMID: 32530905 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative study on satisfaction from hormonal contraceptives: depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), Cyclofem and LD.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011 Fall;16(4):304-8. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011. PMID: 23450146 Free PMC article.
-
Combined and progestagen-only hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk: A UK nested case-control study and meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2023 Mar 21;20(3):e1004188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004188. eCollection 2023 Mar. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 36943819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical