Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case-control study of cancers of the brain--INTERPHONE-Study
- PMID: 15266354
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500390
Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case-control study of cancers of the brain--INTERPHONE-Study
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study is to validate self-reported cellular phone use information by comparing it with the cumulative emitted power and duration of calls measured by software-modified cellular phones (SMP). The information was obtained using a questionnaire developed for the international case-control study on the risk of the use of mobile phones in tumours of the brain or salivary gland (INTERPHONE-study).
Method: The study was conducted in Bielefeld, Germany. Volunteers were asked to use SMPs instead of their own cellular phones for a period of 1 month. The SMP recorded the power emitted by the mobile phone handset during each base station contact. Information on cellular phone use for the same time period from traffic records of the network providers and from face-to-face interviews with the participants 3 months after the SMP use was assessed. Pearson's correlation coefficients and linear regression models were used to analyse the association between information from the interview and from the SMP.
Results: In total, 1757 personal mobile phone calls were recorded for 45 persons by SMP and traffic records. The correlation between the self-reported information about the number and the duration of calls with the cumulative power of calls was 0.50 (P<0.01) and 0.48 (P<0.01), respectively. Almost 23% of the variance of the cumulative power was explained by either the number or the cumulative duration of calls. After inclusion of possible confounding factors in the regression model, the variance increased to 26%. Minor confounding factors were "network provider", "contract form", and "cellular phone model".
Discussion: The number of calls alone is a sufficient parameter to estimate the cumulative power emitted by the handset of a cellular telephone. The cumulative power emitted by these phones is only associated with number of calls but not with possible confounding factors. Using the mobile phone while driving, mainly in cities, or mainly in rural areas is not associated with the recorded cumulative power in the SMP.
Similar articles
-
Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment.Occup Environ Med. 2009 Oct;66(10):664-71. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.043380. Epub 2009 May 21. Occup Environ Med. 2009. PMID: 19465409
-
Validation of self-reported cellular phone use.J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004 May;14(3):245-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500321. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15141153
-
Radio frequency exposure in mobile phone users: implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;123(4):490-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl547. Epub 2007 Jan 9. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007. PMID: 17213224
-
Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: implications for exposure assessment.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;18(2):134-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500555. Epub 2007 Feb 28. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 17327852 Review.
-
Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve?Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006 Dec;15(6):516-23. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000203617.54312.08. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006. PMID: 17106332 Review.
Cited by
-
Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz-6 GHz).J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):37-44. doi: 10.1038/jes.2013.40. Epub 2013 Aug 14. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 23942394
-
Validation of self-reported start year of mobile phone use in a Swedish case-control study on radiofrequency fields and acoustic neuroma risk.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):72-9. doi: 10.1038/jes.2014.76. Epub 2014 Nov 5. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25352163
-
Mapping of radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in outdoor environment and comparing with reference levels for general public health.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;28(2):161-165. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.64. Epub 2016 Nov 2. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 27805622
-
Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF).Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2010 Aug;10(3):245-50. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2696. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2010. Retraction in: Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2010 Nov;10(4):331. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2682. PMID: 20846133 Free PMC article. Retracted. Review.
-
Regression calibration of self-reported mobile phone use to optimize quantitative risk estimation in the COSMOS study.Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 7;193(10):1482-1493. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae039. Am J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38751312 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources