Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Sep;34(5):433-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704589.

Risk assessment and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in pediatric patients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Risk assessment and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in pediatric patients

M A Diaz et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence, risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) and outcome in 80 pediatric patients (36 male) (median age 13 years) who underwent allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Patients were grafted from an HLA-identical sibling after myeloablative conditioning (total body irradiation (TBI) based 52; non-TBI 28). GvHD prophylaxis used were: cyclosporin A (CsA)+ short methotrexate (MTX) in 52 and CsA+/-prednisone in 28. The median number of CD34+ cells infused were 5.8 x 10(6)/kg (range: 1.4-32.8). The median follow-up was 24 months (range: 3-94). In all, 28 patients had cGvHD (confidence interval (CI): 54.2+/-10%). Factors that were significant on univariate analysis were diagnosis (P=0.03) and GvHD prophylaxis administered (P=0.04). On multivariate analysis, only GvHD prophylaxis used was associated with a significant risk of cGvHD (hazard ratio (HR): 3.94; 95% CI: 1.41-10.91, P=0.009). The CI of cGvHD for patients receiving CsA+MTX was 40.9+/-12 vs 76.5+/-18% for patients who did not (P=0.03). The probability of relapse was 36+/-6% for all patients (12.5+/-8% for patients with cGvHD vs 47.9+/-8% without cGvHD). The probability of disease-free survival was better for patients with cGvHD (69.9+/-10 vs 37.9+/-7%; HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.47-5.56; P=0.001). Our data suggest that the GvHD prophylaxis used is the most relevant predictor of cGvHD. Patients with cGvHD had a lower risk of relapse and a better survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms