Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Aug 1;20(3):355-64.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02028.x.

A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinence

Affiliations

A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinence

A E Bharucha et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence, severity and risk factors of faecal incontinence in women in the community are incompletely characterized.

Aim: To develop and validate a self-report questionnaire (faecal incontinence and constipation assessment) to address these issues.

Method: Eighty-three women completed the instrument; 20 randomly selected patients answered the faecal incontinence and constipation assessment again 6 weeks later. A gastroenterologist also completed the faecal incontinence and constipation assessment in all 83 subjects after a detailed clinical assessment. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the patient's self-report to a doctor interview for every question. Reproducibility was evaluated by a test-retest approach for every question. The severity of faecal incontinence was rated by incorporating the frequency and type of faecal incontinence, rectal urgency and use of sanitary devices.

Results: The questionnaire was well-understood. Reproducibility [median kappa statistic, 0.80 (interquartile range: 0.66-0.90)]; and concurrent validity [0.59 (0.47-0.67)] were acceptable. For the index question on faecal incontinence, the kappa for reproducibility and concurrent validity was 0.90 and 0.95, respectively. The faecal incontinence severity score was also valid (kappa = 0.5).

Conclusion: The faecal incontinence and constipation assessment has excellent reproducibility and reasonable validity for assessing the presence, risk factors and severity of faecal incontinence and associated bowel disorders in women when compared against clinical assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources