Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery
- PMID: 15276503
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery
Abstract
Background: The outcome in patients treated surgically for coronary artery disease is known to be influenced by the extent of the disease. Whether this factor also has an effect in patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery using the internal thoracic artery (ITA) (MIDCAB) has not been looked at. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the impact of multivessel disease (MVD) on midterm outcome after MIDCAB.
Methods: From 1996 to 1999, 411 patients received a MIDCAB at our institution and were now followed up. Isolated disease of the LAD (SVD -single vessel disease) was presented in 262 patients (63.7%) and 149 patients (36.3%) had MVD at the time of operation. The reasons for apparent incomplete revascularization in patients with MVD were very small target vessels (< 1.0-mm diameter), stenoses of less than 50%, distal localization of the stenoses, long-term patency after angioplasty, or an extensive risk for sternotomy and(or) cardiopulmonary bypass. The midterm outcome was evaluated by questionnaires sent to the patients and their physicians.
Results: The mean follow-up was 29.4 +/- 11.1 months. The incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly higher in MVD as compared to SVD patients (8.1% vs 1.9%, p = 0.04). Patients with MVD had significantly more subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (10.7% vs 5.3%, p = 0.049) and a similar number of repeat surgical revascularizations as compared to SVD patients. Patients with MVD had a significantly higher total 3-year mortality as compared to SVD patients by Kaplan-Meier estimate (8.7% vs 3.1%, relative risk [RR] = 2.56, p = 0.011). The 3-year cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients with MVD as compared to SVD (4.0% vs 0.4%, RR = 9.48, p = 0.0054). After adjustment of baseline characteristics by Cox regression analysis, the 3-year risk of cardiac death was significantly higher in the MVD groups (RR = 2.2, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.8 to 4.65, p = 0.029).
Conclusions: Patients with isolated disease of the LAD appear to benefit from ITA grafting in the form of a MIDCAB procedure. Here, it should be an approach of choice. The results show that MVD is an independent risk factor for outcome in patients undergoing a MIDCAB procedure. Nevertheless, the midterm morbidity and mortality in MVD patients after a MIDCAB procedure where the LAD is the only target vessel for interventional or surgical treatment is acceptable despite a higher morbidity than in SVD patients.
Similar articles
-
Impact of diabetes on outcome following isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15223417
-
High-risk patients with multivessel disease--is there a role for incomplete myocardial revascularization via minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting?Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(6):E459-62. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20061193. Heart Surg Forum. 2007. PMID: 18187378
-
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol. 2004 Apr 15;93(8):959-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.048. Am J Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15081435
-
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17300948 Review.
-
Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):466-70; discussion 470. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276497 Review.
Cited by
-
Elective minimally invasive coronary artery bypass: shunt or tournique occlusion? Assessment of a protective role of perioperative left anterior descending shunting on myocardial damage. A prospective randomized study.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jul 18;7:69. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-69. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22809563 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Incomplete revascularization: what the surgeon needs to know.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jul;7(4):463-469. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.06.07. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. PMID: 30094210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Nov 17;114(46):777-784. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017. PMID: 29229038 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safe implementation of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: application of learning curves and cumulative sum analysis.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4260-4270. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-775. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34422354 Free PMC article.
-
The MIDCAB approach in its various dimensions.HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3(4):249-53. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011. PMID: 23440055 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical