Novel treatment strategy for leg and sternal wound complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: bioengineered Apligraf
- PMID: 15276544
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.032
Novel treatment strategy for leg and sternal wound complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: bioengineered Apligraf
Abstract
Purpose: To demonstrate that bioengineered Apligraf improves time to wound healing in sternal and leg wound complications after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Description: Between 1998 and 2001, 1,550 patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery utilizing saphenous vein. In 45 (2.9%) of 1,550 patients, leg wound complications developed (group A); and in 15 (0.9%) of 1,550 patients, sternal wound complications developed (group B). Apligraf was utilized as the primary treatment for 30 (66%) of 45 leg wounds and for 9 (60%) of 15 sternal wounds. Traditional wound care included debridement and daily wet-to-dry dressings.
Evaluation: Time to wound healing ranged from 26 to 72 days (mean, 46) for Apligraf group A and from 34 to 120 days (mean, 84) for traditional wound care group A. The time to wound healing ranged from 21 to 80 days (mean, 39) for Apligraf group B, and from 36 to 110 days (mean, 62) for traditional care group B. Apligraf treatment was simpler, with less time and resource utilization than traditional wound care.
Conclusions: Apligraf significantly improves time to wound healing in patients with leg and sternal wound complications and offers an attractive new treatment alternative to traditional wound care.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30. Heart Surg Forum. 2000. PMID: 11178296
-
Prophylactic low-energy shock wave therapy improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1909-13. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.117. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 19022007 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Aug;34(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.028. Epub 2008 May 27. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18508277 Clinical Trial.
-
Sternal preservation: a better way to treat most sternal wound complications after cardiac surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1659-64. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.082. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15511452 Review.
-
Using negative pressure therapy for healing of a sternal wound.Nurs Times. 2005 Apr 19-25;101(16):44-6. Nurs Times. 2005. PMID: 15871378 Review.
Cited by
-
Debridement for surgical wounds.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 7;5(5):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38712723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Debridement for surgical wounds.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 5;2013(9):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 7;5:CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub5. PMID: 24008995 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Bioengineering Approaches and Novel Biomaterials to Enhance Sternal Wound Healing after Cardiac Surgery: A Crosstalk between Innovation and Surgical Practice.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Aug 31;15(9):254. doi: 10.3390/jfb15090254. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39330230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cell Therapy and the Skin: Great Potential but in Need of Optimization.J Invest Dermatol. 2025 May;145(5):1033-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Nov 12. J Invest Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39530953 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical