The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness
- PMID: 15279531
- DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479
The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness
Abstract
The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.
(c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved
Comment in
-
An individual placement and support programme is more effective than skills training and temporary employment for people with severe mental illness.Evid Based Ment Health. 2005 Feb;8(1):19. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.8.1.19. Evid Based Ment Health. 2005. PMID: 15671510 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical