Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial
- PMID: 15280341
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.4.435
Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial
Abstract
Context: The long-term results of randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent survival rates for mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Consequently, the choice of treatment should be based on a patient's preferences.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a decision aid regarding the different surgical treatment options on patient decision making.
Design and setting: A cluster randomized trial for which general surgeons in the communities of central-west, and eastern Ontario, Canada, were randomly assigned to use the decision aid or not in the surgical consultation. Patients received the decision aid or not based on the surgeon seen.
Participants: Twenty surgeons participated in the study. Of the 208 eligible women with newly diagnosed clinical stage I or II breast cancer seen by study surgeons, 201 agreed to be evaluated: 94 were assigned to the decision board and 107 to usual practice. Patients were recruited from November 1999 to April 2002.
Intervention: The decision board is a decision aid designed to help physicians inform their patients about different treatment options and to enable patients to express a preference for treatment.
Main outcome measures: Patient knowledge about the surgical treatment of breast cancer; decisional conflict; satisfaction with decision making; and the treatment decision following the consultation.
Results: Patients in the decision board group had higher knowledge scores about their treatment options (66.9 vs 58.7; P<.001), had less decisional conflict (1.40 vs 1.62, P =.02), and were more satisfied with decision making (4.50 vs 4.32, P =.05) following the consultation. Patients who used the decision board were more likely to choose BCT (94% vs 76%, P =.03).
Conclusions: The decision board was helpful in improving communication and enabling women to make a choice regarding treatment. Such instruments should be considered by surgeons when communicating the different surgical options to women with breast cancer.
Comment in
-
Decision aids from genetics to treatment of breast cancer: long-term clinical utility or temporary solution?JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):496-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.496. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15280348 No abstract available.
-
Evidence-based surgery. Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 19. The effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer.Can J Surg. 2006 Dec;49(6):431-3. Can J Surg. 2006. PMID: 17234074 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy?J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):519-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6215. Epub 2008 Dec 29. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19114703
-
Decision aids on breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01295-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 33092602 Free PMC article.
-
Entertainment education for breast cancer surgery decisions: a randomized trial among patients with low health literacy.Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jul 7. Patient Educ Couns. 2011. PMID: 20609546 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision.J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3091-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15284259
-
An introduction to patient decision aids.BMJ. 2013 Jul 23;347:f4147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4147. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23881944 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
First impressions: A prospective evaluation of patient-physician concordance and satisfaction following the initial medical oncology consultation.Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):22293-22303. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6758. Epub 2023 Dec 8. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 38063318 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision making in oncology practice: what do oncologists need to know?Oncologist. 2012;17(1):91-100. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0261. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Oncologist. 2012. PMID: 22234632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cancer patient and survivor research from the cancer information service research consortium: a preview of three large randomized trials and initial lessons learned.J Health Commun. 2013;18(5):543-62. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.743629. Epub 2013 Feb 28. J Health Commun. 2013. PMID: 23448232 Free PMC article.
-
'They leave at least believing they had a part in the discussion': understanding decision aid use and patient-clinician decision-making through qualitative research.Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 15. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. PMID: 23598292 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development and pilot testing of a communication aid to assist clinicians to communicate with women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).Support Care Cancer. 2011 May;19(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1040-5. Epub 2010 Nov 19. Support Care Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21088858
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous