[New French recommendations for the prophylaxis of infectious endocarditis]
- PMID: 15283036
[New French recommendations for the prophylaxis of infectious endocarditis]
Abstract
New French recommendations on infective endocarditis (IE) prevention were recently published and mark a turning point in the history of antibiotic prophylaxis. Endocarditis is an evolving disease, and its clinical and microbiological profile dramatically changes over time. The French surveys that were conducted in 1991 and 1999 showed variations in underlying heart disease with a decrease in native valvular disease and an increase of IE in patients without previously known heart disease. Moreover, the distribution of responsible microorganisms dramatically changed over time, with a marked decrease of oral streptococci. In addition, some dogmas are now challenged. First of all, the part of responsibility of dental procedures is debated, as dental bacteraemia possibly responsible of endocarditis are more likely due to daily manoeuvres such as tooth brushing or chewing gum than to occasional dental procedures. Moreover, as suggested by case-control studies, efficacy--or lack of efficacy--of antibiotic prophylaxis is far from being clinically proved. For all these reasons, the proportion of theoretically avoidable endocarditis seems very low, and the benefit of largely and systematically applied antibiotic prophylaxis may be discussed, not only in terms of financial cost but also in terms of microbiological threat of emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. So, the general idea of those new recommendations was to maintain the principle and the modalities of antibiotic prophylaxis, but to limit its indications to situations at high benefit to risk ratio, i.e. procedures at high risk in patients at high risk. Depending on the situation, antibiotic prophylaxis may be either recommended or become optional and decision-making factors are defined. Furthermore, the importance of general prophylaxis was emphasised, concerning more specifically oral and cutaneous hygiene, and patients and practitioners' education, such as, for example, recommendations on blood cultures to be performed before any antibiotic treatment in case on fever occurring in a patient at risk during the 3 months following a procedure at risk.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of infective endocarditis: a review of the American Heart Association guidelines.Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Oct-Dec;100(4):25-8. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008. PMID: 19400526 Review.
-
[A revolutionary change in the recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis of infective endocarditis (ie)].Harefuah. 2008 Jun;147(6):532-5, 573. Harefuah. 2008. PMID: 18693631 Review. Hebrew.
-
Perspectives on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19;53(20):1852-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19442883
-
Recommendations on prophylaxis for infective endocarditis: dramatic changes over the past seven years.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Mar;102(3):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Mar 19. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009. PMID: 19375677 Review.
-
Endocarditis prophylaxis revisited: experimental evidence of efficacy and new Swiss recommendations. Swiss Working Group for Endocarditis Prophylaxis.Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000 Jul 11;130(27-28):1013-26. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000. PMID: 10953851
Cited by
-
Infective endocarditis: a comparison of international guidelines.Heart. 2007 Apr;93(4):524-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.057794. Heart. 2007. PMID: 17401073 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical