Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity?
- PMID: 15289217
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00009
Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity?
Abstract
Background: Women have been entering academic medicine in numbers at least equal to their male colleagues for several decades. Most studies have found that women do not advance in academic rank as fast as men and that their salaries are not as great. These studies, however, have typically not had the data to examine equity, that is, do women receive similar rewards for similar achievement?
Objective: To examine equity in promotion and salary for female versus male medical school faculty nationally.
Design: Mailed survey questionnaire.
Setting: 24 randomly selected medical schools in the contiguous United States.
Participants: 1814 full-time U.S. medical school faculty in 1995-1996, stratified by sex, specialty, and graduation cohort.
Measurements: Promotion and compensation of academic medical faculty.
Results: Among the 1814 faculty respondents (response rate, 60%), female faculty were less likely to be full professors than were men with similar professional roles and achievement. For example, 66% of men but only 47% of women (P < 0.01) with 15 to 19 years of seniority were full professors. Large deficits in rank for senior faculty women were confirmed in logistic models that accounted for a wide range of other professional characteristics and achievements, including total career publications, years of seniority, hours worked per week, department type, minority status, medical versus nonmedical final degree, and school. Similar multivariable modeling also confirmed gender inequity in compensation. Although base salaries of nonphysician faculty are gender comparable, female physician faculty have a noticeable deficit (-11,691 dollars; P = 0.01). Furthermore, both physician and nonphysician women with greater seniority have larger salary deficits (-485 dollars per year of seniority; P = 0.01).
Limitations: This is a cross-sectional study of a longitudinal phenomenon. No data are available for faculty who are no longer working full-time in academic medicine, and all data are self-reported.
Conclusions: Female medical school faculty neither advance as rapidly nor are compensated as well as professionally similar male colleagues. Deficits for female physicians are greater than those for nonphysician female faculty, and for both physicians and nonphysicians, women's deficits are greater for faculty with more seniority.
Comment in
-
Unequal pay for equal work: the gender gap in academic medicine.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):238-40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00019. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15289226 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Inequities in Academic Compensation by Gender: A Follow-up to the National Faculty Survey Cohort Study.Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1068-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001250. Acad Med. 2016. PMID: 27276007 Free PMC article.
-
Gender Differences in Salary Compensation for Academic Hand Surgery Faculty at US Medical Schools.J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jun;50(6):663-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.02.014. Epub 2025 Apr 22. J Hand Surg Am. 2025. PMID: 40261222
-
Compensation in academic medicine: progress toward gender equity.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1398-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0329-7. Epub 2007 Aug 13. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17694417 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e050322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050322. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34728447 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting the advancement of minority women faculty in academic medicine: the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(6):541-50. doi: 10.1089/15246090152543120. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001. PMID: 11559451 Review.
Cited by
-
Inequities in Academic Compensation by Gender: A Follow-up to the National Faculty Survey Cohort Study.Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1068-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001250. Acad Med. 2016. PMID: 27276007 Free PMC article.
-
"It's a Little Different for Men"-Sponsorship and Gender in Academic Medicine: a Qualitative Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05956-2. Epub 2020 Jun 29. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 32601927 Free PMC article.
-
Influential Women in the Field of Neurological Rehabilitation: A Literature Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;19(3):1112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031112. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35162136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial (Spring) Board? Gender Composition in High-impact General Surgery Journals Over 20 Years.Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):582-588. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002667. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 29342020 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Women in Department Leadership in Obstetrics and Gynecology With Those in Other Specialties.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):442-447. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001290. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26855110 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources