American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays
- PMID: 15289488
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.065
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment: chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a technology assessment of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays in order to define the role of these tests in routine oncology practice.
Methods: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) established a Working Group to develop the technology assessment. The Working Group collaborated with the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) Technology Evaluation Center. The Working Group developed independent criteria for selecting articles for inclusion in the ASCO assessment, and developed a structured data abstraction tool to facilitate review of selected manuscripts. One Working Group member and an ASCO staff member independently reviewed the 1,139 abstracts identified by the BCBSA comprehensive literature search, and by an updated literature search performed by ASCO using the BCBSA search strategy (1966 to January 2004). Of the 12 articles included in this technology assessment, eight were identified by the original BCBSA systematic review, one was provided by industry, and three were identified by the ASCO updated literature review.
Results: Review of the literature does not identify any CSRAs for which the evidence base is sufficient to support use in oncology practice.
Recommendations: The use of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays to select chemotherapeutic agents for individual patients is not recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Oncologists should make chemotherapy treatment recommendations on the basis of published reports of clinical trials and a patient's health status and treatment preferences. Because the in vitro analytic strategy has potential importance, participation in clinical trials evaluating these technologies remains a priority.
Comment in
-
Chemosensitivity and resistance assays: a systematic review?J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3640-1; author reply 3646-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.236. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15908685 No abstract available.
-
In vitro drug resistance versus chemosensitivity: two sides of different coins.J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3641-3; author reply 3646-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.281. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15908686 Review. No abstract available.
-
Chemotherapy sensitivity and response assays: are the ASCO guidelines for clinical trial design too restrictive?J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3643-4; author reply 3646-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.321. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15908687 No abstract available.
-
Resisting a fundamentalist policy.J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3645-6; author reply 3646-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.270. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15908688 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3328-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.0354. Epub 2011 Jul 25. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21788567
-
Erythropoietin use in oncology: a summary of the evidence and practice guidelines comparing efforts of the Cochrane Review group and Blue Cross/Blue Shield to set up the ASCO/ASH guidelines.Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(3):455-66. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2005.01.023. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005. PMID: 15792920 Review.
-
Practical guidelines for diagnostic use of in vitro chemosensitivity tests.Anticancer Res. 2007 May-Jun;27(3A):1365-7. Anticancer Res. 2007. PMID: 17593632
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines: opportunities and challenges.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 20;26(24):4022-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7139. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18711193
-
The ASH/ASCO clinical guidelines on the use of erythropoietin.Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(3):433-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2005.01.020. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005. PMID: 15792917 Review.
Cited by
-
Current status and future outlook for patient-derived cancer models from a rare cancer research perspective.Cancer Sci. 2021 Mar;112(3):953-961. doi: 10.1111/cas.14669. Epub 2021 Feb 6. Cancer Sci. 2021. PMID: 32986888 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients.Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(30):4717-4728. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160505114326. Curr Pharm Des. 2016. PMID: 27145761 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peek before you treat? Is it a fantasy or reality?J Oncol Pract. 2011 Sep;7(5):338-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000405. J Oncol Pract. 2011. PMID: 22211134 Free PMC article.
-
Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance testing: to be "standard" or to be individualized, that is the question.Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(2):82-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-006-0366-7. Gastric Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16767362 Review.
-
Response evaluation in head and neck oncology.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;267(4):481-2. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1192-4. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20052588 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources