Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: applicability in clinical and research practice
- PMID: 15289770
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.050
Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: applicability in clinical and research practice
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders with the use of the Rome II criteria and to compare these data with the classic Iowa criteria.
Study design: Patients recorded defecation and encopresis frequency. A standard history was taken and a physical examination including a rectal examination was done. The prevalence of both criteria was assessed and compared.
Results: One hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients (age, 0.66 to 15.76 years; 131 male subjects) were included. According to the Rome II criteria, 64%, 18%, and 21% of patients fulfilled the criteria for functional constipation, functional fecal retention, and functional nonretentive fecal soiling, respectively. Using the classic criteria, 74% and 18% of patients fulfilled the criteria for pediatric constipation and solitary encopresis, respectively; 16% of the patients fulfilling the pediatric constipation criteria were not recognized by the Rome II constipation criteria. Fair agreement was found between functional nonretentive fecal soiling and solitary encopresis. Encopresis was present in 79% of constipated children.
Conclusions: The Rome criteria are restrictive and exclude several children with constipation. We recommend including encopresis and rectal digital examination and excluding arbitrary age limits and retentive behavior in the revision of the Rome criteria.
Similar articles
-
Functional defecation disorders in children: comparing the Rome II with the Rome III criteria.J Pediatr. 2012 Oct;161(4):615-20.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.060. Epub 2012 May 11. J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22578584
-
Functional defecation disorders in children: PACCT criteria versus Rome II criteria.J Pediatr. 2007 Oct;151(4):394-98, 398.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jul 12. J Pediatr. 2007. PMID: 17889076
-
Functional defecation disorders in children with lower urinary tract symptoms.J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1886-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.064. Epub 2012 Oct 30. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23123369
-
[Functional childhood gastrointestinal disorders. II. Constipation and solitary encopresis: physiology and pathophysiology].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Jun 28;147(26):1264-7. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003. PMID: 12861666 Review. Dutch.
-
A classification of disorders of defecation in infants and children.Semin Gastrointest Dis. 1994 Jan;5(1):20-3. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 1994. PMID: 8069617 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Constipation in children: novel insight into epidemiology, pathophysiology and management.J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jan;17(1):35-47. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.35. Epub 2011 Jan 26. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011. PMID: 21369490 Free PMC article.
-
The usefulness of ultrasound examination of the bowel as a method of assessment of functional chronic constipation in children.Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Dec;37(12):1247-52. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0659-y. Epub 2007 Oct 19. Pediatr Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17952426
-
The Leech method for diagnosing constipation: intra- and interobserver variability and accuracy.Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Jan;36(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-0031-z. Epub 2005 Nov 10. Pediatr Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16283286
-
Constipation in children: fibre and probiotics.BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 10;2015:0303. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015. PMID: 25758093 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of body mass index on children with functional constipation and healthy controls.J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Jul;2(3):222-6. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.120715. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013. PMID: 24479087 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical