Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Dec;31(12):1599-605.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1613-y. Epub 2004 Jul 31.

Relation between wall thickening on gated perfusion SPECT and functional recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Relation between wall thickening on gated perfusion SPECT and functional recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Mario Petretta et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether wall thickening analysis by gated perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is useful in predicting functional recovery after revascularization.

Methods: Forty-one patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction, EF, 36+/-6%) who were scheduled for revascularization underwent rest 99mTc-sestamibi gated SPECT.

Results: Of 131 akinetic or dyskinetic segments at baseline echocardiography, 82 (63%) recovered after revascularization. Compared with wall thickening analysis, perfusion imaging provided higher sensitivity (78% vs 50%, P<0.0001) and specificity (80% vs 71%, P<0.0005). Among segments with > or =55% sestamibi uptake (viable), those with detectable wall thickening had a higher likelihood of functional recovery than those with absent wall thickening (95% vs 77%, P<0.05). In segments with improved function, the absence of wall thickening was associated with lower sestamibi activity than was observed when detectable wall thickening was present (58+/-14% vs 71+/-13%, P<0.0005). An increase in EF of > or =5% was detectable in 22 (54%) patients. For the prediction of EF improvement, perfusion imaging provided a higher sensitivity than wall thickening analysis (68% vs 41%, P<0.05), while specificity was not significantly different (68% vs 74%). The prevalence of patients with functional recovery did not change when wall thickening analysis was considered in addition to perfusion status (73% in patients with detectable wall thickening and 70% in those without; P=NS).

Conclusion: In patients with coronary artery disease, wall thickening analysis by gated perfusion SPECT provides additional information compared with perfusion data for the prediction of segmental functional recovery. However, on a patient basis, wall thickening assessment seems to be of more limited value than perfusion status.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):418-28 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998 Jan;25(1):60-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Mar;280(3):H929-36 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997 Jan-Feb;4(1 Pt 1):3-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jan 1;83(1):1-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources