Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Aug;18(5):463-82.
doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr764oa.

Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of available evidence

Affiliations

Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of available evidence

Heather Gage et al. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the available evidence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacological rehabilitation interventions for people with Parkinson's disease, and identify future research needs.

Design: Electronic searches of four databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsychLIT) 1980-2002; examination of reference lists of relevant papers. Controlled trials and observational studies were included. Data extraction and quality assessment of papers by two independent reviewers. A narrative review.

Setting: Rehabilitation interventions delivered either in subjects' own homes, or in clinical settings as outpatients.

Subjects: Community-living adults with Parkinson's disease.

Interventions: Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, psychological counselling and support, and education.

Main measures: A range of outcomes: mobility, functional status, speech, swallowing, psychological well-being, as determined by the studies included in the review.

Results: Forty-four different studies (reported in 51 papers) were included (25 physiotherapy, 4 occupational therapy, 10 speech and language therapy, 3 psychological counselling, 1 educational, 1 multidisciplinary). All studies, except one, reported improvements on at least one outcome measure.

Conclusions: Findings may reflect publication bias, but suggest interventions can affect patients' lives for the better in a variety of ways. It is difficult to interpret the clinical importance of statistically significant improvements reported in most studies. There is a need for methodologically more robust research with meaningful follow-up periods, designed in a manner that separates specific and nonspecific effects. Cost-effectiveness evidence is required to provide clear guidance on service extensions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources