Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans

Abstract

Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual "filling-in" of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.

Figure 1.

a, Examples of stimulus configurations forming and not forming modal or amodal illusory shapes. b, Group-averaged (n = 9) VEPs from each stimulus condition at a left and right posterior electrode. c, Results of the spatiotemporal topographic pattern analysis. d, Global field power waveforms from each stimulus condition, as well as the corresponding bar graphs showing results of area measures (SEM shown). See Results for full details.

Figure 2.

Group-averaged (n = 9) LAURA source estimation for each stimulus condition over the 140-238 and 240-298 msec periods.