Wear properties of alumina/zirconia composite ceramics for joint prostheses measured with an end-face apparatus
- PMID: 15299238
Wear properties of alumina/zirconia composite ceramics for joint prostheses measured with an end-face apparatus
Abstract
While only alumina is applied to all-ceramic joint prostheses at present, a stronger ceramic is required to prevent fracture and chipping due to impingement and stress concentration. Zirconia could be a potential substitute for alumina because it has high strength and fracture toughness. However, the wear of zirconia/zirconia combination is too high for clinical use. Although some investigations on composite ceramics revealed that mixing of different ceramics was able to improve the mechanical properties of ceramics, there are few reports about wear properties of composite ceramics for joint prosthesis. Since acetabular cup and femoral head of artificial hip joint are finished precisely, they indicate high geometric conformity. Therefore, wear test under flat contact was carried out with an end-face wear testing apparatus for four kinds of ceramics: alumina monolith, zirconia monolith, alumina-based composite ceramic, and zirconia based composite ceramic. Mean contact pressure was 10 MPa and sliding velocity was 40 mm/s. The wear test continued for 72 hours and total sliding distance was 10 km. After the test, the wear factor was calculated. Worn surfaces were observed with a scanning electron micrograph (SEM). The results of this wear test show that the wear factors of the both composite ceramics are similarly low and their mechanical properties are much better than those of the alumina monolith and the zirconia monolith. According to these results, it is predicted that joint prostheses of the composite ceramics are safer against break down and have longer lifetime compared with alumina/alumina joint prostheses.
Similar articles
-
Low wear rate of UHMWPE against zirconia ceramic (Y-PSZ) in comparison to alumina ceramic and SUS 316L alloy.J Biomed Mater Res. 1991 Jul;25(7):813-28. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820250703. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991. PMID: 1918102
-
Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.J Prosthodont. 2008 Oct;17(7):538-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00346.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26. J Prosthodont. 2008. PMID: 18761572
-
All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.Swed Dent J Suppl. 2005;(173):1-69. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16001730
-
Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Oct;(379):94-112. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000. PMID: 11039797 Review.
-
Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology.Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Aug;74(4):380-8. doi: 10.1080/00016470310017668. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003. PMID: 14521286 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of ceramic-on-ceramic implants for total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Surg. 2010 Aug;2(3):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00083.x. Orthop Surg. 2010. PMID: 22009945 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1143-9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 19885712 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources