Indirect blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: Korotkoff phase 4 versus phase 5

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding which Korotkoff phase should be used to estimate diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy, some authorities recommending phase 5 (disappearance of sounds) and others suggesting phase 4 (muffling). Available data indicate that Korotkoff phase 5 more closely approximates true intraarterial diastolic pressure in pregnant women. Nonetheless, it has been suggested that phase 5 is unmeasurable in a significant number of gravid women, making this end point less desirable. However, studies examining this issue indicate that Korotkoff phase 5 is determinable in more than 90% of gravid women and that the incidence of an indeterminable phase 4 is at least as great as that for phase 5. Moreover, there appears to be greater observer variability in the measurement of phase 4 compared with phase 5. We conclude that available evidence supports recommendations for the use of Korotkoff phase 5 as the preferred end point to estimate diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy. In those few patients having very low or indeterminate phase 5 determinations, both phase 4 and phase 5 should be recorded and the former used to guide patient management. An alternative strategy is to record both phases in all gravid women beginning at the first prenatal visit so that baseline phase 4 values are available in the event that phase 5 becomes indeterminate.