Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour
- PMID: 15300356
- DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1973-9
Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour
Abstract
Rationale: External stimuli (S+) that reliably signal that addictive drugs are available command the focus of selective attention and control instrumental action that procures the drug. According to incentive salience theory, as the contingency between the S+ and the drug is learned the magnitude of attentional orienting towards the S+ increases. By contrast, alternative theories propose that processing of the S+ becomes more efficient with training such that the measured attentional orienting response elicited by the S+ decreases.
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to prompt half of participants to acquire explicit knowledge of the stimulus-reinforcer contingencies arranged in training, to examine the impact of this manipulation on the magnitude of attentional orienting towards the S+.
Methods: Smokers (n=32) completed an instrumental discrimination training procedure in which a set of stimuli were established as differential predictors that an instrumental response would yield tobacco-smoke reinforcement. During training, attention for the stimuli and performance of the instrumental tobacco-seeking response were measured in parallel. One group (n=16) was prompted to develop explicit knowledge of the discriminative contingencies in training whereas another group (n=16) underwent discrimination training without prompting.
Results: The prompted group reported accurate knowledge of the contingencies and showed no attentional orienting response towards the S+. By contrast, the unprompted group reported inaccurate knowledge of the contingencies and showed an attentional orienting response towards the S+. The S+ appeared to control the instrumental tobacco-seeking response in both groups equally.
Conclusions: The results suggest that attention for drug paired S+ is associated with the process of learning about the relationship between those cues and the drug.
Similar articles
-
Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0. Epub 2005 Sep 21. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16175406 Review.
-
Discriminative stimuli that control instrumental tobacco-seeking by human smokers also command selective attention.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Aug;168(4):435-45. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1456-4. Epub 2003 Apr 29. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003. PMID: 12719961
-
Contingency knowledge is necessary for learned motivated behaviour in humans: relevance for addictive behaviour.Addiction. 2006 Aug;101(8):1153-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01459.x. Addiction. 2006. PMID: 16869845
-
Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 May;185(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0287-x. Epub 2006 Mar 18. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16547713 Clinical Trial.
-
Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Aug;138(3-4):231-59. doi: 10.1007/s002130050668. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998. PMID: 9725746 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence for habitual and goal-directed behavior following devaluation of cocaine: a multifaceted interpretation of relapse.PLoS One. 2009 Sep 25;4(9):e7170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007170. PLoS One. 2009. PMID: 19779607 Free PMC article.
-
Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0. Epub 2005 Sep 21. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16175406 Review.
-
Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.Learn Mem. 2019 Feb 15;26(3):66-76. doi: 10.1101/lm.048272.118. Print 2019 Mar. Learn Mem. 2019. PMID: 30770463 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise?Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Jul;192(4):593-608. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0760-9. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007. PMID: 17361393
-
What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Oct 1;167:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016. PMID: 27507657 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources