Epidemiologic approach for cancer screening. Problems in design and analysis of trials
- PMID: 1530116
- DOI: 10.1097/00043426-199205000-00005
Epidemiologic approach for cancer screening. Problems in design and analysis of trials
Abstract
The goal of cancer screening is early detection and treatment of disease with a consequent reduction in mortality. The difficult task of evaluating whether a particular screening program can achieve this goal is the theme of this article. Our focus is on the two principal components of the screening process. The first component is the ability of the screening test to detect cancer early, while minimizing the number of false positive results. In this regard, the specificity of the test ordinarily must be very high, approaching 99%. The second component in the screening process is evaluating the overall impact of a screening program. For this, various study designs have been proposed. The best procedure, the randomized controlled trial, is discussed in detail, but alternative designs are also considered. The endpoint in any such study should be cancer-specific mortality. The problems inherent in other outcome variables, such as stage shift and increased length of survival due to lead time and length biases are addressed. Also considered are major difficulties in study design and evaluation, such as inadequate knowledge of the natural history of the disease, particularly of preclinical lesions. Key data items that should be collected for evaluation are listed.
Similar articles
-
Statistical considerations in cancer screening programs.Urol Clin North Am. 1990 Nov;17(4):699-708. Urol Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2120836
-
Cancer screening.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000 Aug;14(4):831-48. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70314-2. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10949776 Review.
-
Screening trials are even more difficult than we thought they were.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Feb 6;94(3):156-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.3.156. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002. PMID: 11830599 No abstract available.
-
Basic issues in population screening for cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 May;64(5):1263-72. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980. PMID: 6767876
-
Screening for disease: making evidence-based choices.Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Feb;10(1):73-6. doi: 10.1188/06.CJON.73-76. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16482730 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of survivorship-based research on defining clinical care guidelines.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2085-92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0642. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011. PMID: 21980016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bilateral disease and new trends in Wilms tumour.Pediatr Radiol. 2008 Jan;38(1):30-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0681-0. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Pediatr Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18026724
-
Lower Thyroid Cancer Mortality in Patients Detected by Screening: A Meta-Analysis.Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023 Feb;38(1):93-103. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1667. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023. PMID: 36891656 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/13651820410024049. HPB (Oxford). 2005. PMID: 18333158 Free PMC article.
-
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Imaging Advances in 2024 with a Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 14;32(1):40. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010040. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39851956 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources