Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov;43(11):1434-40.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh367. Epub 2004 Aug 10.

Development and validation of an elbow score

P Sathyamoorthy  1 , G J Kemp, A Rawal, V Rayner, S P Frostick
Affiliations

Development and validation of an elbow score

P Sathyamoorthy et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Aug;44(8):1081

Abstract

Objectives: Few of the questionnaires available for evaluating the function and clinical state of the elbow have been validated. An ideal score would be consistent, sensitive, reliable and elbow-specific, incorporating both patient perception and clinician assessment. This was our aim.

Methods: Items were generated using 25 patients and expert opinion, and reduced using 25 new patients to yield a nine-item patient questionnaire and a six-item clinical evaluation (of strength, motion and ulnar nerve involvement). This was validated using 63 new patients (of whom 28 were studied twice without therapy and 18 were studied again after appropriate surgery).

Results: The test-retest reliability coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) were both good. Convergent validity was attested by good correlations with other scores, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) (physical) (R2 = 0.62 and 0.29, P < 0.0005). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by correlating preoperative-postoperative changes to those in DASH and NHP (physical) (R2 = 0.50 and 0.27, P < 0.04).

Conclusion: This is a reliable, internally consistent score, correlating well with other, non-elbow specific scores and sensitive to change on treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types