The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT
- PMID: 15313087
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.015
The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT
Abstract
Background: Population-wide screening for people at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is under consideration in Australia.
Methods: Qualitative methods were used to examine the views of community members who did (n = 18) or did not (n = 12) participate in a pilot program of FOBT screening. In addition, views were obtained from general practitioners (GPs) and specialist gastroenterologists directly involved in the implementation of the program. Two focus group sessions were conducted with screening participants and interviews were conducted with nonparticipants, GPs and gastroenterologists.
Results: The findings suggest that CRC screening by FOBT distributed to households by mail was well accepted by the community and by the medical practitioners involved in its implementation. The trial had little negative effect on general practice. Both medical practitioners and consumers raised concerns about the efficacy of FOBT screening. Medical practitioners were also concerned about the potential burden mass screening could place on the public (government-funded) health care sector.
Conclusions: It would seem that CRC screening using FOBT will not enjoy unqualified support from the community or from medical practitioners involved in the continuum of screening. Information about the objectives of screening programs, in general, and the efficacy of FOBT screening in particular, needs to be provided to the community to ensure informed individual choice.
Similar articles
-
Would general practitioners support a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of faecal-occult blood testing?Intern Med J. 2004 Sep-Oct;34(9-10):532-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00652.x. Intern Med J. 2004. PMID: 15482265
-
Survey on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practice physicians in Lazio, Italy.Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.010. Epub 2004 Dec 30. Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 15916990
-
Colorectal cancer screening practise is influenced by ethnicity of medical practitioner and patient.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06872.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012. PMID: 21793910
-
How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.Prev Med. 2010 Apr;50(4):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 20153359 Review.
-
Faecal occult blood test as a screening test for colorectal cancer.Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2005 Apr-Jun;68(2):244-6. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2005. PMID: 16013643 Review.
Cited by
-
Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 7;14:238. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-238. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24606951 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.Br J Cancer. 2014 Apr 2;110(7):1705-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.125. Epub 2014 Mar 11. Br J Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24619071 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams.BMC Public Health. 2006 Nov 6;6:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-272. BMC Public Health. 2006. PMID: 17083746 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1645-57. doi: 10.1111/hex.12157. Epub 2013 Nov 25. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 24268129 Free PMC article.
-
Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention Policies: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.Int J Prev Med. 2022 Jan 19;13:8. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_419_20. eCollection 2022. Int J Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35281982 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical