Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
- PMID: 15316563
- PMCID: PMC2747721
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082
Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
Abstract
Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complication rate, and duration that the CVAPD remained functional, following insertion by interventional radiologists in patients with solid tumours. A prospective study was undertaken in 110 consecutive patients who had insertion of 111 subclavian CVAPD. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 17-83), 64 were females; 68 patients (61%) had gastrointestinal tumours and 25 (23%) had breast cancer. CVAPD were successfully implanted in all but one patient. There were four (4%) immediate major complications: thrombosis 2 and pneumothorax 2. Nine patients (8%) had bruising or pain. Four devices (4%) became infected. In total, 100 CVAPD (90%) were either removed as planned at the end of treatment (n=23) after a median 203 days, or remained in situ for a median of 237 days (7-1133). Premature removal occurred in eight patients due to infection (n=4), thrombosis (n=3) or faulty device (n=1). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Radiological insertion of CVAPD is safe and convenient with low rates of complications.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2333-44. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0981-2. Epub 2008 May 6. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18458909 Review.
-
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7. Eur J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9301441 Clinical Trial.
-
[Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) - related complications in colorectal cancer patients].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010 Mar;37(3):453-5. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010. PMID: 20332682 Japanese.
-
Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20(5):935-40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn701. Epub 2009 Jan 29. Ann Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19179550 Clinical Trial.
-
Central venous access port devices - a pictorial review of common complications from the interventional radiology perspective.J Vasc Access. 2012 Jan-Mar;13(1):9-15. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2011.8439. J Vasc Access. 2012. PMID: 21725953 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1224-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2045-7. Epub 2011 Jan 5. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21207035
-
Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?Radiol Med. 2017 Jun;122(6):472-478. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0736-8. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Radiol Med. 2017. PMID: 28210920
-
Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.World J Urol. 2012 Jun;30(3):399-404. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0752-6. Epub 2011 Aug 28. World J Urol. 2012. PMID: 21874511
-
Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2333-44. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0981-2. Epub 2008 May 6. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18458909 Review.
-
Use of standard hypodermic needles for accessing laparoscopic adjustable gastric band ports.Obes Surg. 2010 Jun;20(6):761-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9945-0. Obes Surg. 2010. PMID: 19730961
References
-
- Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, Bothe A, Benotti PN, Arkin CF, Greco FA, Huberman M, Moore C (1990) Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. A randomized prospective trial. Ann Intern Med 112: 423–428 - PubMed
-
- Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, de Lucia F, Scarpa D, Testori A, Orsi F, Bellomi M, Mauri S, Aapro M, Andreoni B (1997) Long term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Eur J Cancer 13: 1190–1194 - PubMed
-
- Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A, Nole F, Andreoni B (1998) Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy: a prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days. Ann Oncol 9: 767–773 - PubMed
-
- Broadwater JR, Henderson M, Bell J, Broadwater JR, Henderson MA, Bell JL, Edwards MJ, Smith GJ, McCready DR, Swanson RS, Hardy ME, Shenk RR, Lawson M, Ota DM, Balch CM (1990) Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients. Am J Surg 160: 676–680 - PubMed
-
- Damascelli B, Patelli G, Frigerio LF, Lanocita R, Garbagnati F, Marchiano A, Spreafico C, Di Tolla G, Monfardini L, Porcelli G (1997) Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: study of 134 patients over 24,596 catheter days. AJR 168: 1235–1239 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical