Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Aug 19:5:23.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-5-23.

Genetic structure of four socio-culturally diversified caste populations of southwest India and their affinity with related Indian and global groups

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Genetic structure of four socio-culturally diversified caste populations of southwest India and their affinity with related Indian and global groups

Revathi Rajkumar et al. BMC Genet. .

Abstract

Background: A large number of microsatellites have been extensively used to comprehend the genetic diversity of different global groups. This paper entails polymorphism at 15 STR in four predominant and endogamous populations representing Karnataka, located on the southwest coast of India. The populations residing in this region are believed to have received gene flow from south Indian populations and world migrants, hence, we carried out a detailed study on populations inhabiting this region to understand their genetic structure, diversity related to geography and linguistic affiliation and relatedness to other Indian and global migrant populations.

Results: Various statistical analyses were performed on the microsatellite data to accomplish the objectives of the paper. The heretozygosity was moderately high and similar across the loci, with low average GST value. Iyengar and Lyngayat were placed above the regression line in the R-matrix analysis as opposed to the Gowda and Muslim. AMOVA indicated that majority of variation was confined to individuals within a population, with geographic grouping demonstrating lesser genetic differentiation as compared to linguistic clustering. DA distances show the genetic affinity among the southern populations, with Iyengar, Lyngayat and Vanniyar displaying some affinity with northern Brahmins and global migrant groups from East Asia and Europe.

Conclusion: The microsatellite study divulges a common ancestry for the four diverse populations of Karnataka, with the overall genetic differentiation among them being largely confined to intra-population variation. The practice of consanguineous marriages might have attributed to the relatively lower gene flow displayed by Gowda and Muslim as compared to Iyengar and Lyngayat. The various statistical analyses strongly suggest that the studied populations could not be differentiated on the basis of caste or spatial location, although, linguistic affinity was reflected among the southern populations, distinguishing them from the northern groups. Our study also indicates a heterogeneous origin for Lyngayat and Iyengar owing to their genetic proximity with southern populations and northern Brahmins. The high-ranking communities, in particular, Iyengar, Lyngayat, Vanniyar and northern Brahmins might have experienced genetic admixture from East Asian and European ethnic groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neighbor-joining tree depicting the genetic relationship of Karnataka populations with related Indian and global ethnic groups based on 15 STR markers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regression plot demonstrating the relatively higher gene flow levels in high-ranking populations of India. Abbreviations used in figure: OB-Oriya Brahmin, PL-Pallar, IB-Iyngar Brahmin, VN-Vanniyar, LY-Lyngayat, TK-Tanjorekallar, GD-Goundar, Mu-Muslim, BB-Bihar Brahmin, GO-Gowda.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cann RL. Genetic clues to dispersal in human populations: Retracing past from the present. Science. 2001;291:1742–1748. doi: 10.1126/science.1058948. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majumder PP. People of India: Biological diversity and affinities. Evolutionary Anthropology. 1998;6:100–110. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:3<100::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-I. - DOI
    1. Papiha SS. Genetic variation in India. Hum Biol. 1996;68:607–628. - PubMed
    1. Roychoudhury AK. Genetic relationships of the populations of eastern India. Ann Hum Biol. 1992;19:489–501. - PubMed
    1. Mastana SS, Papiha SS. Genetic variability of transferring subtypes in the populations of India. Hum Biol. 1998;70:729–44. - PubMed

Publication types