Comparing minimally invasive funnel chest repair versus the conventional technique: an outcome analysis in children

Abstract

Surgical correction of pectus excavatum in children has gained new momentum since the introduction of the new minimally invasive repair by Nuss. To date, no studies directly evaluate the outcome of the new technique versus that of the conventional technique. From 2000 to 2002, 28 patients underwent pectus excavatum correction in the authors' hospital. Twenty-one were treated by minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and seven patients had open correction. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, clinical outcome, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. In the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum group, the children were younger (14.4 +/- 2.9 versus 17.8 +/- 3.2 years), had shorter operation times (53 +/- 18 versus 125 +/- 6 minutes), and had less blood loss (minimal versus 380 +/- 175 ml). No intraoperative complications were recorded. In the conventional group, two pleural lacerations occurred. Early postoperative complications in the minimally invasive repair group included two pneumothoraces and one case of pleural effusion. In the conventional group, one pneumothorax and one case of pleural effusion occurred. Late postoperative complications in the Nuss group included one costal erosion, two bar dislocations, one severe wound infection requiring bar removal, one hematothorax, and one case of postpericardiotomy syndrome; in the conventional group, there was one severe wound infection. In both groups, the patients rated their cosmetic results as good to very good. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is a novel method with clear advantages, such as limited surgical trauma and small scars. The high rate of postoperative complications may decrease with growing experience in the future. In well-selected patients (age, symmetric deformity), the Nuss procedure may become the method of choice. However, there is still a lack of long-term follow-up.