Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep;15(9):1348-51.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh355.

Safety of sentinel node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Safety of sentinel node biopsy in pregnant patients with breast cancer

O Gentilini et al. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have typically been contraindicated for pregnant patients diagnosed with breast cancer because they are considered unsafe.

Patients and methods: Twenty-six premenopausal non-pregnant patients who were candidates for LS underwent peritumoral injection of approximately 12 MBq of 99mTc-HSA nanocolloids. Static [15 min and 16 h post-injection (p.i.)] and whole-body (16 h p.i.) scintigraphic images were acquired. Activity concentration in the urine (0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-16 h p.i.) was evaluated by a gamma-counter. Activity in the bloodstream was measured at 4 and 16 h p.i. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were placed, before tracer injection, on the injection site, between injection site and epigastrium (two points), and on the epigastrium, umbilicus and hypogastrium, and were removed before surgery.

Results: Scintigraphic images showed no radiotracer concentration except in the injection site and in the sentinel node. In all patients, the total activity excreted within the first 16 h was <2% of the injected activity. Activity in the blood pool was, at each time point, <1% of the injected activity. In 23 of 26 patients, all absorbed dose measurements were lower than the sensitivity of the TLD (<10 microGy); in the remaining three patients, the absorbed doses at the level of epigastrium, umbilicus and hypogastrium were in the following ranges: 40-320, 120-250 and 30-140 microGy, respectively.

Conclusions: According to our standard technique (12 MBq of 99mTc-HAS), LS and SLNB can be performed safely during pregnancy, since the very low prenatal doses from this diagnostic procedure, when properly performed, do not significantly increase the risk of prenatal death, malformation or mental impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types