What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten
- PMID: 15319392
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh446
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten
Abstract
The most relevant standard of success in IVF has been discussed widely. An optimal standard should reflect both the risk aspects and the effectiveness of the treatment. The most important parameter for the couple is the ultimate cumulative delivery rate per started cycle. Even if the long-term follow-up of the treatment cycles is difficult in practice, we would stress that more emphasis should be given to embryo freezing, in order to maximize the efficiency of the IVF/ICSI cycles. The contribution of embryo cryopreservation in elective single embryo transfer cycle programmes may result in a cumulative delivery rate of >50%. In Finland, the implementation of single embryo transfer has been possible with good cryopreservation programmes. The effect of this strategy has been seen in a decrease in the proportion of twin deliveries after assisted reproduction, being 13.9% for 2002, as well as a reduction of the proportion of multiple births in the nationwide Medical Birth Registry.
Similar articles
-
[Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Oct 28;88(39):2755-8. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 19080449 Chinese.
-
Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1127:49-58. doi: 10.1196/annals.1434.012. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008. PMID: 18443329 Review.
-
Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.017. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16818031
-
Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004 Sep;7(3):175-82. doi: 10.1080/14647270400006929. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004. PMID: 15590571
-
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal.Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Mar-Apr;11(2):105-21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh049. Epub 2004 Oct 28. Hum Reprod Update. 2005. PMID: 15514015 Review.
Cited by
-
Elective transfer of two embryos: reduction of multiple gestations while maintaining high pregnancy rates.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Jan;24(1):11-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9085-6. Epub 2006 Dec 22. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007. PMID: 17186398 Free PMC article.
-
2017-2018 Assisted Reproduction Cost Analysis Performance Indexes: Lombardy County Case Study.Front Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 12;3:693715. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.693715. eCollection 2021. Front Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 36303956 Free PMC article.
-
Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e012218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012218. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28082363 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Success of frozen embryo transfer: Does the type of gonadotropin influence the outcome?Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 9;2:89-98. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s9586. Int J Womens Health. 2010. PMID: 21072302 Free PMC article.
-
Major Factors Affecting the Live Birth Rate After Frozen Embryo Transfer Among Young Women.Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Mar 24;7:94. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00094. eCollection 2020. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 32266278 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical