Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with bilateral corneal blindness
- PMID: 15319790
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701534
Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with bilateral corneal blindness
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with bilateral corneal blindness.
Methods: Bilaterally blind patients who had undergone optical penetrating keratoplasty (PK) were evaluated on optical and refractive parameters and presence of complications if any. The results at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were compared with age-matched and indication-matched unilaterally blind controls.
Results: The most common indication for surgery in both the groups was the presence of a corneoiridic scar. Best corrected visual acuity of > or =6/18 was seen in five (16.66%) patients in the study group and in 11 (36.66%) patients in the control group (P = 0.14). In all, 15 (50%) grafts in the study group and six (20%) in the control group failed (P = 0.03). The most common cause of failure was graft infection (40%) in the study group and post-PK glaucoma (20%) in the control group. The percentage of graft rejection as a cause of graft failure was the same in both the groups. A composite socioeconomic status scale based on family literacy and income suggested that 70% of the cases in the study group and 30% in the control group belonged to the low socioeconomic group (P = 0.004).
Conclusion: The outcome of optical penetrating keratoplasty in patients with bilaterally blinding corneal disease is poorer than those who are unilaterally blind. Low socioeconomic status may be a contributing factor for the poor outcome.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Apr 28. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18440638
-
Pattern of bilateral blinding corneal disease in patients waiting for keratoplasty in a tertiary eye care centre in northern India.Cornea. 2010 Mar;29(3):269-71. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181b6104e. Cornea. 2010. PMID: 20118783
-
Half top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty: 1-year results.Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;93(12):1629-33. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.156836. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19939796
-
Corneal blindness and xenotransplantation.Xenotransplantation. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):99-114. doi: 10.1111/xen.12082. Epub 2014 Feb 21. Xenotransplantation. 2014. PMID: 25268248 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology of corneal blindness in developing countries.Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):436-9. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991. PMID: 1782156 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0150118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150118. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26938450 Free PMC article.
-
Data gap: Transplantable corneal blindness, current transplantation, and eye banking in India.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;71(9):3125-3127. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2096_23. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37602596 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Corneal Regeneration Using Gene Therapy Approaches.Cells. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):1280. doi: 10.3390/cells12091280. Cells. 2023. PMID: 37174680 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cure rate following rejection in bilateral corneal grafts for keratoconus.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2010 Jul;5(3):145-50. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2010. PMID: 22737348 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical