Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):425.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.425.

National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care

Monica Escher  1 , Thomas V Perneger, Jean-Claude Chevrolet
Affiliations

National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care

Monica Escher et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine what influences doctors' decisions about admission of patients to intensive care.

Design: National questionnaire survey using eight clinical vignettes involving hypothetical patients.

Setting: Switzerland.

Participants: 402 Swiss doctors specialising in intensive care.

Main outcome measures: Rating of factors influencing decisions on admission and response to eight hypothetical clinical scenarios.

Results: Of 381 doctors agreeing to participate, 232 (61%) returned questionnaires. Most rated as important or very important the prognosis of the underlying disease (82%) and of the acute illness (81%) and the patients' wishes (71%). Few considered important the socioeconomic circumstances of the patient (2%), religious beliefs (3%), and emotional state (6%). In the vignettes, underlying disease (cancer versus non-cancerous disease) was not associated with admission to intensive care, but four other factors were: patients' wishes (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 4.6), "upbeat" personality (2.9, 1.9 to 4.4), younger age (1.5, 1.1 to 2.2), and a greater number of beds available in intensive care (1.8, 1.2 to 2.5).

Conclusions: Doctors' decisions to admit patients to intensive care are influenced by patients' wishes and ethically problematic non-medical factors such as a patient's personality or availability of beds. Patients with cancer are not discriminated against.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Doctors' ranking of factors when assessing patients for admission to intensive care
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jacobs P, Noseworthy TW. National estimates of intensive care utilization and costs: Canada and the United States. Crit Care Med 1990;18: 1282-6. - PubMed
    1. Society of Critical Medicine Ethics Committee. Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA 1994;271: 1200-3. - PubMed
    1. American Thoracic Society. Fair allocation of intensive care unit resources. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156: 1282-1301. - PubMed
    1. Society of Critical Medicine. Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Crit Care Med 1999;27: 633-8. - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Vinsonneau C, Garrouste M, Cohen Y, et al. Compliance with triage to intensive care recommendations. Crit Care Med 2001;29: 2132-6. - PubMed

Publication types