Pre-operative intercostal nerve blockade for minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery: a standardised anaesthetic regimen for rapid emergence and early extubation
- PMID: 15322574
Pre-operative intercostal nerve blockade for minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery: a standardised anaesthetic regimen for rapid emergence and early extubation
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) has become a popular adjunct to cardiac bypass surgery in selected patients. Although MIDCAB without cardiopulmonary bypass is considered to be a relatively noninvasive procedure, the trauma to the muscle tissue caused by the anterolateral thoracotomy often leads to more pain than that of patients undergoing routine sternotomy. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the pre-operative application of an intercostal nerve blockade, combined with general anaesthesia for peri- and postoperative pain control, and its efficacy for early extubation.
Methods and results: Nine consecutive patients undergoing MIDCAB surgery were evaluated. Pre-operative ipsilateral intercostal nerve blockade was employed in all patients. After induction, isofluran (0.4-0.8%) and nitrous oxide in combination with the pre-operative nerve blockade provided sufficient anaesthesia throughout the procedure (mean operative time: 147 min). Only 2/9 patients required additional small doses of narcotics. All patients could be safely extubated within 15 minutes of skin suture. Postoperative discomfort and pain were minimal.
Conclusion: From our initial experience with preoperative intercostal nerve blockade for the MIDCAB procedure, we concluded that it provides profound somatic analgesia as an effective adjunct to general anaesthesia with reduced doses of narcotics and sedatives. MIDCAB impresses with its ease of technical performance, its reliability and safety. The minimised chest-wall pain improves patients' chances of early tracheal extubation. In accordance with the minimally invasive surgical approach, it provides a contribution towards 'minimally invasive anaesthesia'. The surgeons' and the patients' acceptance is excellent. Because the results of this study are based on observation and verbalisation of the investigators' impressions, and no objective measurements were made which would have allowed a comparison between the MIDCAB technique and the golden standard of general anaesthesia with opioid analgesia, a further study should be conducted to prove our theory.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery.Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):157-62. Heart Surg Forum. 2002. PMID: 12114131
-
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: initial Connecticut experience.Conn Med. 1997 Mar;61(3):135-41. Conn Med. 1997. PMID: 9097484
-
[Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;51(11):1016-20. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24444688 Chinese.
-
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276503 Review.
-
AANA journal course: update for nurse anesthetists--anesthetic considerations for minimally invasive direct vision coronary artery bypass grafting.AANA J. 1999 Aug;67(4):361-7. AANA J. 1999. PMID: 10497458 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of continuous intercostal nerve block vs. single shot on analgesic outcomes and hospital stays in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01607-7. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 35260084 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical