Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended conservative therapy versus surgical intervention in the management of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc

Abstract

The management of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc for patients not responding to an initial trial of conservative therapy is generally surgical. Little is known about the effect of continued conservative therapy on patients who have not improved or have deteriorated within the first 3 months. This study assessed which form of treatment, surgical or continued conservative therapy, is more cost-effective once an adequate trial of conservative therapy has failed. The study is a retrospective chart review of 55 white male truck drivers who presented with acutely herniated nucleus pulposus between 1985 and 1989. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery, and 30 underwent continued conservative therapy after initial rehabilitation. No significant difference was found in outcome (80% good or fair in both the surgical and conservative groups) or costs ($55,000 +/- $1,000/case during a 5-year period), hence no difference in the cost-effectiveness between the two treatment modalities (each $63,000 +/- $2,000/adjusted outcome). Conservatively treated patients, however, missed significantly more work. It was concluded that, for a patient not responding to the initial trial of conservative therapy, the option to undergo continued conservative treatment should be made available.