Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of peak flowmeters at 1,400 m

Abstract

Peak flow meters provide physicians and patients with objective measures about changes in pulmonary obstruction. We evaluated eight models of peak flowmeters and measured their accuracy and reproducibility with methods recently recommended by the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP). Waveforms from the American Thoracic Society's spirometer testing set were used to drive a computer-controlled syringe. Testing was done at Salt Lake City at an altitude 1,400 m. It appears that the original Wright peak flowmeter has been used as the "de facto" standard. We found that the original Wright peak flowmeter overestimated flows in its midrange; and, as a consequence, most of the other peak flowmeters also overestimated peak flows. The overestimation of peak flows may have been understated because of the 1,400-m altitude testing site. To the credit of the instrument manufacturers, we were pleasantly surprised with the quality, accuracy, and reproducibility of presently available peak flowmeters; however, as a result of our testing, we suspect that with little effort, manufacturers of peak flowmeters could improve the accuracy of their devices. Standardized testing methods and equipment should make the task of peak flowmeter design, manufacture, and testing even easier. We trust that manufacturers of peak flowmeters will respond appropriately and improve their instruments.