Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Sep;86(3):337-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.04.038.

Management of early pregnancy loss

Affiliations
Review

Management of early pregnancy loss

G C M Graziosi et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: In order to assess the available evidence on the management of early pregnancy loss, we performed a meta-analysis on the subject.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for randomized studies reporting on the effectiveness of expectant management, misoprostol treatment or curettage. Outcomes considered were 'complete evacuation', complications, duration of bleeding, pain resulting from the procedure, side effects and women's satisfaction with the procedure.

Results: Thirteen studies were identified. Combined data in women with missed abortion managed expectantly or treated with misoprostol showed complete evacuation rates of 28% (49/173) (range 14-47%) and 81% (242/298) (range 60-83%), respectively. In women with incomplete abortion, these rates were 94% (31/33) (range 80-100%) and 99% (75/76) (range 99-100%), respectively.

Conclusion: In the management of early pregnancy loss both expectant management and misoprostol treatment reduce the need for curettage, but misoprostol treatment seems to be more effective in women with missed abortion as compared to expectant management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources