Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules
- PMID: 1532819
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.211
Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules
Abstract
Adaptive network and exemplar-similarity models were compared on their ability to predict category learning and transfer data. An exemplar-based network (Kruschke, 1990a, 1990b, 1992) that combines key aspects of both modeling approaches was also tested. The exemplar-based network incorporates an exemplar-based category representation in which exemplars become associated to categories through the same error-driven, interactive learning rules that are assumed in standard adaptive networks. Experiment 1, which partially replicated and extended the probabilistic classification learning paradigm of Gluck and Bower (1988a), demonstrated the importance of an error-driven learning rule. Experiment 2, which extended the classification learning paradigm of Medin and Schaffer (1978) that discriminated between exemplar and prototype models, demonstrated the importance of an exemplar-based category representation. Only the exemplar-based network accounted for all the major qualitative phenomena; it also achieved good quantitative predictions of the learning and transfer data in both experiments.
Similar articles
-
ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):22-44. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.22. Psychol Rev. 1992. PMID: 1546117
-
Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1160-73. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1160. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003. PMID: 14622053
-
Rules and exemplars in category learning.J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Jun;127(2):107-40. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.107. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998. PMID: 9622910 Clinical Trial.
-
Is there an exemplar theory of concepts?Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1035-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0834-3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 27294422 Review.
-
Thirty categorization results in search of a model.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):3-27. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000. PMID: 10682288 Review.
Cited by
-
Penguins, Birds, and Pilot Knowledge: Can an Overlooked Attribute of Human Cognition Explain Our Most Puzzling Aircraft Accidents?Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):662-674. doi: 10.1177/0018720820960877. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 33021409 Free PMC article.
-
Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Sep;6(3):495-503. doi: 10.3758/bf03210840. Psychon Bull Rev. 1999. PMID: 12198789 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014. Front Neural Circuits. 2014. PMID: 25352784 Free PMC article.
-
Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample.J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):155-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-155. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999. PMID: 10220928 Free PMC article.
-
Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization.Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):160-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196273. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002. PMID: 12026949
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources