Prognostic significance of E-cadherin protein expression in pathological stage I-III endometrial cancer
- PMID: 15328195
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0943-03
Prognostic significance of E-cadherin protein expression in pathological stage I-III endometrial cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Decreased expression of E-cadherin in endometrial cancer cells is associated with adverse prognostic features. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of decreased E-cadherin expression in patients with endometrial cancer.
Experimental design: Between 1992 and 1999, 102 endometrial cancer patients with stage I-III disease underwent primary surgery at the University of Chicago. Representative tissue specimens were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody to E-cadherin. A semiquantitative evaluation scale was developed based on the percentage of endometrial cancer cells with membranous E-cadherin staining. Tissue sections were scored as "3" if >75%, "2" if 25-75%, "1" if 5-25%, and "0" if <5% of cells stained. E-Cadherin staining was correlated with overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and extrapelvic progression. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for clinicopathological characteristics and adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up for the study group was 58.5 months.
Results: E-Cadherin staining was scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 29.4%, 18.6%, 26.5%, 25.5% of cases, respectively. E-Cadherin expression was positively correlated with myometrial invasion (Kendall tau: 0.30, P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with grade (Kendall tau: -0.13, P = 0.15) and papillary serous or clear cell histology (Kendall tau: -0.14, P = 0.12). Five-year actuarial OS, CSS, PFS, and extrapelvic recurrence rates for negative (score = 0), heterogeneous (score = 1-2), and positive (score = 3) staining were as follows: OS, 69.2 versus 75.7 versus 81.0% (P = 0.64); CSS, 78.8 versus 91.2 versus 95.5% (P = 0.19); PFS, 69.1 versus 88.6 versus 92.2% (P = 0.079), and extrapelvic progression, 20.8 versus 7.3 versus 4.0% (P = 0.17). On multivariate Cox regression, a higher E-cadherin expression score was associated with decreased overall mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-1.03; P = 0.066), and statistically significant decreases in endometrial cancer mortality (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.055-0.94; P = 0.040), disease progression (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.77; P = 0.014), and extrapelvic recurrence (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.062-0.97; P = 0.045).
Conclusions: Decreased E-cadherin expression is an independent prognostic factor for disease progression and mortality in pathological stage I-III endometrial cancer. Evaluation of E-cadherin expression may aid in the selection of patients for more aggressive adjuvant therapy.
Similar articles
-
The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Oct;103(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.038. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Gynecol Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16545441
-
A multicenter evaluation of sequential multimodality therapy and clinical outcome for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Sep;114(3):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jun 26. Gynecol Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19560193
-
Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.054. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 15850910
-
The significance of adnexal involvement in endometrial carcinoma.Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Jul;74(1):74-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5415. Gynecol Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10385554 Review.
-
[Prognostic factors in stomach carcinoma].Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998 Mar 25;87(13):435-42. Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998. PMID: 9584568 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Telmisartan Facilitates the Anticancer Effects of CARP-1 Functional Mimetic and Sorafenib in Rociletinib Resistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Anticancer Res. 2021 Sep;41(9):4215-4228. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15226. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Anticancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34475041 Free PMC article.
-
The significance of markers in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.Prz Menopauzalny. 2016 Nov;15(3):176-185. doi: 10.5114/pm.2016.63500. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Prz Menopauzalny. 2016. PMID: 27980530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Prognostic Factors in High-Grade Non-Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Endometrium (HG-NECs): Is It Possible to Identify Subgroups at Increased Risk?Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;13(13):2171. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132171. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37443564 Free PMC article.
-
Development of prediction models for lymph node metastasis in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(7):1014-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0745-6. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Br J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32037399 Free PMC article.
-
Expression of E-Cadherin and N-Cadherin in the Endocervix as a Predictive Factor in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 21;25(6):3547. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063547. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38542521 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources