Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2004 Aug;70(8):730-2.

Group A streptococcal puerperal sepsis with retroperitoneal involvement developing in a late postpartum woman: case report

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15328810
Case Reports

Group A streptococcal puerperal sepsis with retroperitoneal involvement developing in a late postpartum woman: case report

Keiko Okumura et al. Am Surg. 2004 Aug.

Abstract

Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci cause a wide range of infectious diseases such as pharyngitis, impetigo, rheumatic fever, and even septic shock. Group A streptococcal puerperal sepsis is uncommon today, but recent reports indicate a reemergence of virulent strains can cause toxic-mediated shock and multiple organ failure. We present a case report of a 29-year-old postpartum woman after cesarean section who presented group A streptococcal puerperal sepsis. Furthermore, we discuss the GAS strain in this patient and its relation with close contact among family members. The group A streptococci (GAS) were isolated from the patient's retroperitoneal fluid and from her husband's throat swab, respectively. Both isolates were shown to be identical: M type 1. It is well known that exotoxin A produced by M1 or M3 serotypes of the organisms plays a crucial role in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). We conclude that in this patient, close contacts of persons with GAS appear to be at risk for colonization with identical strains of STSS-causing GAS such as M1 or M3 serotypes. Therefore, the appropriate antibiotic including antibiotic prophylaxis for close contact should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources