Progesterone and preterm: seventy years of "déjà vu" or "still to be seen"?
- PMID: 15330887
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00315.x
Progesterone and preterm: seventy years of "déjà vu" or "still to be seen"?
Abstract
Progestogens for the prevention of preterm birth have a long history. In 2003, two widely publicized double-blind trials, one of daily vaginal progesterone suppositories and the other of weekly intramuscular injections of 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, claimed that the treatments effectively reduce the incidence of preterm birth in women at risk of spontaneous preterm labor. Critical analysis of the reports provides no convincing evidence that either one of these treatments is worth pursuing outside the context of controlled research to determine, first, whether and, second, how the treatments might work.
Comment on
-
Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):419-24. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.41. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12592250 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 12;348(24):2379-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035140. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12802023 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
