The new Italian IVF legislation
- PMID: 15333237
- DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62118-9
The new Italian IVF legislation
Abstract
Last February, the Italian Parliament gave final approval to a new Law regulating assisted reproduction technology. The new legislation fell short of the expectations of infertile couples and of all specialists in the field. There are three problems with the new Italian law; they involve social issues, human rights and the application of technology. The present paper focuses on the fact that the new rules infringe upon basic human rights and the proper application of IVF technology, because they mandate procedures that are against the best interest of the woman seeking pregnancy. The main point of controversy is the combination of a mandatory limit of three embryos for transfer, and an obligation to reimplant all produced embryos; cryopreservation of excess embryos is prohibited. Obviously, this decreases the chances of most women to achieve pregnancy, while at the same time it increases the number and complexity of procedures they need to undergo and may expose some to an unacceptable increase in the risk of multiple pregnancy. The new law is inspired by the desire to protect every newly produced embryo; this is a commendable aim, although it is in total opposition to a law passed over 25 years ago that liberalized voluntary termination of first trimester pregnancies. This means that today Italy has a law that protects every early, pre-implantation embryo, and another that allows the 'suppression' of every post-implantation one. From a technical point of view, given the low level of human fecundity, the only way to prevent the 'loss' of even one preimplantation embryo is to simply ban IVF altogether, an option that Italian legislators obviously did not have the courage to opt for. The tragedy is that Italian infertile couples are now confronted with new rules that not only severely limit the ability of physicians to correctly apply IVF technology, but are so confused that, depending on the interpretation, anyone may try to nullify the main ideological premise upon which the entire law has been structured.
Comment in
-
Italian Law 40/2004: a view from the 'Wild West'.Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Jan;12(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60972-8. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006. PMID: 16454924
Similar articles
-
The 2004 Italian legislation regulating assisted reproduction technology: a multicentre survey on the results of IVF cycles.Hum Reprod. 2005 Aug;20(8):2224-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei011. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Hum Reprod. 2005. PMID: 15817586
-
The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):854-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.051. Epub 2007 Aug 6. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17681340
-
Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 5;113 Suppl 1:S24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.006. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. PMID: 15041126 Review.
-
Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 23;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0324-4. BMC Womens Health. 2016. PMID: 27449932 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 18773532 Review.
Cited by
-
Oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in European countries: statutory background, practice, storage and use.Hum Reprod Open. 2017 Mar 29;2017(1):hox003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox003. eCollection 2017. Hum Reprod Open. 2017. PMID: 30895222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process.Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2374-86. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq123. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Hum Reprod. 2010. PMID: 20616356 Free PMC article.
-
20 Years Since the Enactment of Italian Law No. 40/2004 on Medically Assisted Procreation: How It Has Changed and How It Could Change.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;22(2):296. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020296. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40003521 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oocyte Cryopreservation - Current Scenario and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Oct-Dec;14(4):340-349. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_21. Epub 2021 Dec 31. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021. PMID: 35197678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aquaporin7 plays a crucial role in tolerance to hyperosmotic stress and in the survival of oocytes during cryopreservation.Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 4;5:17741. doi: 10.1038/srep17741. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26634435 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources